[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[icann-europe] article for discussion
IS THAT FEASIBLE TO MANIPULATE HUMAN BRAIN AT DISTANCE?
Last year, in October, the congresman Denis J. Kucinich introduced in
the American
Congress a bill, obliging the American president to get engaged in the
negotiations aimed
at the ban of space based weapons. In this bill the definition of a weapon
system includes:
„any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means inflicting death or
injury on, or
damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health,
mental health, or
physical and economic well-being of a person)… through the use of
land-based, sea-
based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic,
psychotronic, sonic,
laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted
populations for the
purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons
or
populations“(12). As in all legislative acts quoted in this article the bill
counts with
sound, light or electromagnetic stimulation of human brain. Psychotronic
weapons
remain, at least for a layman uninformed of secret military research, in the
sphere of
science fiction, since so far none of the published scientific experiments
was presented in
the way which would allow for its replication.
That it is feasible to manipulate human behavior with the use of
subliminal, either
sound or visual, messages is now generally known. This is why in most of the
countries
the use of such technologies, without consent of the user, is baned. Devices
using light for
the stimulation of the brain show another way how the light flashing in
certain
frequencies could be used for the manipulation of human psychic life. As for
the sound, a
report on the device transmitting a beam of sound waves, which can hear only
persons at
whom the beam of sound waves is targeted, appeared last year in the world
newspapers.
The beam is formed by a combination of sound and ultrasound waves which
causes that a
person targeted by this beam hears the sound inside of his head. Such a
perception could
easily convince the human being that it is mentally ill. The facts presented
in this article
suggest that with the development of technology and knowledge of the
functioning of
human brain new ways of manipulation of human mind keep emerging. One of
them
seems to be the electromagnetic energy.
Though in the open scientific literature only some 30 experiments were
published,
supporting this assumption (1),(2), already in 1974, in the USSR, after
succesfull testing
with military unit in Novosibirsk, the installation Radioson (Radiosleep)
was registered
with the Government Committee on the Matters of Inventions and Discoveries
of the
USSR, described as a method of induction of sleep by means of radio waves
(3), (4), (5).
In the scientific literature technical feasibility of making a human being
asleep by radio
waves is confirmed in the book by English scientist carrying out research on
the
biological effects of electromagnetism (6). In the report by World Health
Association on
nonionizing radiation from 1991 we read "Many of biological effects observed
in animals
exposed to ELF fields appear to be associated, either directly or
indirectly, with the
nervous system…" (2). Among the published experiments there are experiments
where
pulsed microwaves caused the synchronization of isolated neurons with the
frequency of
pulsing of microwaves - for example a neuron firing at a frequency 0.8 Hz
was forced in
this way to fire the impulses at a frequency of 1 Hz. As well pulsed
microwaves changed
the concentration of neurotransmitters in brain (neurotransmitters are a
part of the
mechanism which causes the firing of neurons in the brain) and reinforced or
attenuated
the effects of drugs delivered into the brain (1). The experiment where the
main brain
frequencies registered by EEG were synchronized with the frequency of
microwave
pulsing (1,2) might explain the function of the Russian installation
Radioson. Microwaves
pulsed in the sleep frequency would cause the synchronization of the brain
activity with
the sleep frequency and in this way produce the sleep. Pulsing of microwaves
in
frequency predominating in the brain at awaked state could by the same
procedure deny
the sleep to a human being. A report derived from the testing program of the
Microwave
Research Department at the Walter Read Army Institute of research states
"Microwave
pulses appear to couple to the central nervous system and produce
stimulation similar to
electric stimulation unrelated to heat". In a many times replicated
experiment microwaves
pulsed in an exact frequency caused the efflux of calcium ions from the
nerve cells (1,2).
Calcium plays a key role in the firing of neurons and Ross Adey, member of
the first
scientific team which published this experiment, publically expressed his
conviction that
this effect of electromagnetic radiation would interfere with concentration
on complex
tasks (7). Robert Becker, who had share in the discovery of the effect of
pulsed fields at
the healing of broken bones, published the excerpts from the report from
Walter Reed
Army Institute testing program. In the first part "prompt debilitation
effects" should have
been tested (8). Were not those effects based on the experiment by Ross Adey
and others
with calcium efflux? British scientist John Evans, working in the same
field, wrote that
both Ross Adey and Robert Becker lost their positions and research grants
and called
them "free-thinking exiles" (6). In 1975, in the USA, a military experiment
was published
where pulsed microwaves produced, in the brain of a human subject, an audio
perception
of numbers from 1 to 10 (9). Again the possibility to convince human being
that it is
menatlly ill is obvious. The testing program of American Walter Read Army
Institute of
Research, where the experiment took place, counts with "prompt auditory
stimulation by
means of auditory effects" and finally aims at "behavior controled by
stimulation" (8).
Let us imagine that the words delivered into the brain were transcribed into
ultrasound
frequencies. Would not then the subject perceive those words as his own
thoughts? And
could not then his behavior be controled in this way? The American Air Force
1982
"Final Report On Biotechnology Research Requirements For Aeronautical
Systems
Through the Year 2000" states: "While initial attention should be toward
degradation of
human performance through thermal loading and electromagnetic field effects,
subsequent work should address the possibilities of directing and
interrogating mental
functioning, using externally applied fields…" (10).
Several scientists warned that latest advances in neurophysiology
could be used for
the manipulation of human brain. In June 1995, Michael Persinger, who worked
on the
American Navy's project of Non-lethal electromagnetic weapons (11),
published, in a
scientific magazine, an article where he states: „the technical capability
to influence
directly the major portion of the approximately six billion brains of the
human species
without mediation through classical sensory modalities by generating neural
information
within a physical medium within which all members of the species are
immersed… is
now marginally feasible“ (12). In 1998, the French National Bioethics
Committee warned
that „neuroscience is being increasingly recognized as posing potential
threat to human
rights“ (13). In May 1999 the neuroscientists conference, sponsored by the
UN, took
place in Tokyo. In the declaration we read: "Today we have intellectual,
physical and
financial resources to master the power of the brain itself, and to develop
devices to touch
the mind and even control or erase consciousness…We wish to profess our hope
that such
pursuit of knowledge serves peace and welfare" (14).
The events at the international political scene, in the last few years,
confirm that the
concept of remote control of human brain is a matter of negotiations. In
January 1999 the
European Parliament passed a resolution where it „calls for an international
convention
introducing a global ban on all developments and deployments of weapons
which might
enable any form of manipulation of human beings.“ (15)
Already in 1997 nine states of the Union of Independent States
addressed OUN, OBSE
and the states of the Interparliamentary Union with the proposal to place at
the agenda of
the General Assembly of the Organization of United Nations the preparation
and
conclusion of an international convention „On Prevention of Informational
Wars and
Limitation of Circulation of Informational Weapons“ (17), (3).
The initiative was originaly proposed, in the Russian State Duma, by
Vladimir Lopatin
(1). V. Lopatin worked, from 1990 to 1995, in sequence, in the Committees on
Security
of the Russian Federation, Russian State Duma and Interparliamentary
Assembly of the
Commonwealth of Independent States, specializing in informational security
(3). The
concept of informational weapon or informational war is rather unknown to
the world
general public. In 1999, V. Lopatin, together with Russian scientist
Vladimir Tsygankov,
published a book „Psychotronic Weapon and the Security of Russia“ (3). There
we find
the explanation of this terminology: "In the report on the research of the
American
Physical Society for the year 1993 the conclusion is presented that
psychophysical
weapon systems…can be used… for the construction of a strategic arm of a new
type
(informational weapon in informational war)…" Among many references to this
subject
we find Materials of the Parliament Hearings "Threats and Challenges in the
Sphere of
Informational Security", Moscow, July 1996, "Informational Weapon as a
Threat to the
National Security of the Russian Federation" (analytical report of the
Intelligence Service
of the Russian Federation), Moscow, 1996 and a material "To Whom Will Belong
the
Conscienscious Weapon in the 21st century", Moscow, 1997. (18). In 2000 V.
Lopatin
introduced, after two other authors, the third in order bill on the subject
of "Informational
and Psychological Security of the Russian Federation“. The Russian
newspaper
Segodnya wrote about this draft: „…means of informational-psychological
influence are
capable not only to harm the health of a person, but, as well, cause – and
quotation of
Lopatin‘s draft follows – „the blocking of freedom of will of human being on
subliminal
level, the loss of ability of political, cultural and other
selfidentifiction of human being,
the manipulation of societal consciousness“ and even „destruction of united
informational
and spiritual space of Russia“ (17).
In the book "Psychotronic Weapon and the Security of Russia" the
authors propose
among the basic principles of the Russian concept of the defense against the
remote
control of human psyche the acknowledgement of its factual existence as well
as the
acknowledgement of „realistic feasibility of informational, psychotronic war
(which as a
matter of fact is actually taking place without declaration of war)“ (19).
They quote as
well the record from the session of the Russian Federation Federal Council
where V.
Lopatin stated that psychotronic weapon can "cause the blocking of the
freedom of will of
a human being on a subliminal level" or "instillation into the consciousness
or
subconsciousness of a human being of information which will cause faulty
perception of
the reality" (20). For that matter they propose the preparation of national
legislative as
well as the norms of international law "aimed at the defense of human psyche
against
subliminal, destructive, informational effects" (21). As well they propose
the
declassificcation of all works on this technology and warn that, as a
consequence of the
classification, the arms race is speeding up making the psychotronic war
probable.
Among the possible sources of remote influence on human psyche they list the
„generators of physical fields“ of "known as well as unknown nature" (22).
In 1999 the STOA (Scientific and Technological Options Assessment),
part of the
Directorate General for Research of the European Parliament published the
report on
Crowd Control Technologies, ordered by them with the OMEGA foundation in
British
Manchester (23). One of four major subjects of the study are the „2nd
generation“ or "non
lethal" technologies: "This report evaluates the second generation of
'non-lethal' weapons
which are emerging from national military and nuclear weapons laboratories
in the
United States as part of the Clinton Administration's 'non-lethal' warfare
doctrine now
adopted in turn by NATO. These devices include weapons using… directed
energy
beam,…radio frequency, laser and accoustic mechanisms to incapacitate human
targets"
(24) The report states that „the most controversial ‚non-lethal‘ crowd
control …
technology proposed by the U.S., are so called Radio Frequency or Directed
Energy
Weapons that can allegedly manipulate human behavior… the greatest concern
is with
systems which can directly interact with the human nervous system“ (25). The
report also
states that „perhaps the most powerful developments remain shrouded in
secrecy“ (26).
The unavailability of offical documents confirming the existence of this
technology may
be the reason why the OMEGA report is referencing, with respect to mind
control
technology, the internet publication of the author of this article (27). In
an identical
approach the internet publication of the directrice of the American human
rights and anti
mind control organization (CAHRA), Cheryl Welsh, is referenced by joint
initiative of
Quaker United Nations Office, United Nations Institute for Disarmament
Research, and
Programme for Strategic and International Security Studies, with respect to
non-lethal
weapons (28).
On September 25th, 2000 the Committee on Security of the Russian State
Duma
discussed the addendum to the article 6 of the Federal law On Weapons. In
the resolution
we read: „The achievements of contemporary science… allow for creation of
measured
methods of secret, remote influencing on the psyches and physiology of a
person or a
group of people“ (29). The committee recommended that the addendum be
approved.
The addendum to the article 6 of the Russian Federation law „On Weapons
“was
approved on July 26, 2001. It states: „ within the territory of the Russian
Federation is
prohibited the circulation of weapons and other objects… the effects of the
operation of
which are based on the use of electromagnetic, light, thermal, infra-sonic
or ultra-sonic
radiations…“ (30). In this way the Russian government made a first step to
stand up to its
dedication to the ban of mind control technology.
In the Doctrine of Informational Security of the Russian Federation,
signed by
president Putin in September 2000, among the dangers threatening the
informational
security of Russian Federation, is listed „the threat to the constitutional
rights and
freedoms of people and citizens in the sphere of spiritual life… individual,
group and
societal consciousness“ and "illegal use of special means affecting
individual, group and
societal consciousness" (31). Among the major directions of the
international cooperation
toward the guaranteeing of the informational security is listed „the ban of
production,
dissemination and use of 'informational weapon‘ “ (32). This should be
interpreted as the
continuing Russian dedication to the international ban of the means of
remote influencing
of the activity of human brain.
In the above mentioned report, published by the STOA, the originally
proposed
version of the resolution of the European Parliament is quoted, calling for
„an
international convention for a global ban on all research and development…
which seeks
to apply knowledge of the chemical, electrical, sound vibration or other
functioning of the
human brain to the development of weapons which might enable the
manipulation of
human beings, including a ban of any actual or possible deployment of such
systems.“(33) Here the term "actual" might easily mean that such weapons are
already
deployed.
Among the countries with the most advanced military technologies those
are the USA
which did not present any international initiative demanding the ban of
technologies
enabling the remote control of human mind. (The original version of the bill
by Denis J.
Kucinich was changed.) All the same, according to the study published by
STOA, the
USA are the major promoter of the use of those arms. Non lethal technology
was
included into NATO military doctrine due to their effort: "At the initiative
of the USA,
within the framework of NATO, a special group was formed, for the
perspective use of
devices of non-lethal effects" states the record from the session of the
Committe on
Security of the Russian State Duma (29). The report published by STOA
states: "In
October 1999 NATO announced a new policy on non-lethal weapons and their
place in
allied arsenals" (34). "In 1996 non-lethal tools identified by the U.S. Army
included…
directed energy systems" and "radio frequency weapons" (35) - those weapons,
as was
suggested in the STOA report as well, are being associated with the effects
on human
nervous system. According to the Russian government informational agency
FAPSI, in
the last 15 years, the U.S. expenses on the development and acquisition of
the means of
informational war grew four times and at present time they occupy the first
place among
all military programs (17),(3).Though there are other concepts of
informational war than
mind control, the unwillingnes of the USA to engage in the negotiations
aimed at the ban
of the manipulation of human brains might indicate their intent to use those
means in
internal as well as international affairs. One clear consequence of the
continuation of the
apparent politics of secrecy surrounding technologies enabling remote
control of human
brains might be that the governments, who would own such technologies, could
use them
without having to take into consideration the opinion of the general
public. The concept
of the democratic world would be, though secretly, disrupted in this way,
and in the
future the world populations could live in only fake democracy where their
own or
foreign governments might, by means of secret technologies, shape their
opinions.
Mojmir Babacek
(the author is the founder of the International Movement for the Ban of the
Manipulation
of Human Nervous System by Technical Means
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm )
Please send the payment for the article at the address:
Ceska Sporitelna
Vaclavske namesti 16
110 00 Praha 1
Czech Republic
EUROPE
SWIFT CODE GIBACZPX
Account number 001118-0140728263/0800
Name of the account Mojmir Babacek
Phone number 42 (Czech Republic) 436 (area code) 313257
Since Saturday until Tuesday 42 (Czech Republic) 2 (area code) 66610784
(after 7 PM, central European time)
Please let me know if you are going to publish the article.
Mojmir Babacek
REFERENCES
1) Handbook of Biological Effects of Electromadnetic Fields, 1996, CRC Press
Inc.,
0-8493-0641-8/96, - pg. 117, 119, 474- 485, 542-551, 565 at the top and
third and
last paragraph
2) World Health Organization report on non-ionizing radiation from 1991, pg.
143
and 207-208
3) V. Lopatin, V Cygankov: „Psichotronnoje oru˛ie i bezopasnost Rossii“,
SINTEG,
Russian Federation, Moscow, ISBN 5-89638-006-2-A5-2000-30, list of the
publications of the publishing house you will find at the address
http://www.sinteg.ru/cataloghead.htm
4) G. Gurtovoj, I. Vinokurov: „Psychotronnaja vojna, ot mytov k realijam“,
Russsian
Federation, Moscow, „Mysteries“, 1993, ISBN 5-86422-098-1
5) With greatest likelihood as well the Russian daily TRUD, which has
organized the
search for the documents, Moscow, between August 1991 and end of 1992
6) John Evans: Mind, Body and Electromagnetism, the Burlington Press,
Cambridge,
1992, ISBN 1874498008, str.139
7) Robert Becker: "Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of
Life",
William Morrow and comp., New York, 1985, pg. 287
8) Robert Becker: "Cross Currents, teh Startling Effects of Electromagnetic
Radiation
on your Health", 1991, Bloomsburry Publishing, London, Great Brittain, ISBN
0-
7475-0761-9, pg. 304, Robert Becker refers to Bioelectromagnetics Society
Newsletter, January and February 1989
9) Don R. Justesen, 1975, Microwaves and Behavior, American Psychologist,
March
1975, pg. 391 - 401
10) Dr. Nick Begich and Jeane Maning: "Angels Don't Play This HAARP,
Advances in
Tesla Technology", Earthpulse Press, 1995, ISBN 0-9648812--0-9, pg. 169
11) http://www.dcn.davis.ca.us/~welsh/byrdexp.htm see at the bottom of the
page the "Bio
of Principal Investigator"
12) M. A. Persinger: „On the Possibility of Directly Lacessing Every Human
Brain by
Electromagnetic Induction of Fundamental Algorythms“, Perception and Motor
Skills, June1995,, sv. 80, str. 791-799
13) Nature, vol.391, 22.1.1998,str.316, „Advances in Neurosciences May
Threaten
Human Rights“
14) Internet reference at the site of the United Nations University and
Institute of
Advanced Studies in Tokyo does not work any more, to verify the information
it is
necessary to find the document from the 1999 UN sponsored conference of
neuroscientists in Tokyo, you may inquire at the address unuias@ias.unu.edu
15) http://www.europarl.eu.int/home/default_en.htm?redirected=1 click at
Plenary
sessions, scroll down to Reports by A4 number –click, choose 1999 and fill
in 005
to A4
16) http://thomas.loc.gov./ and search for Space Preservation Act then click
at
H.R.2977
17) Russian daily Segodnya, 11. February, 2000, Andrei Soldatov: „Vsadniki
psychotronitscheskovo apokalypsa" (Riders of Psychotronic Apokalypse)
18) See ref. 3), pg. 107
19) See ref. 3) pg. 97
20) See ref. 3), pg. 107
21) See ref. 3), pg. 108
22) See ref. 3) pg. 13
23) http://www.europarl.eu.int/stoa/default_en.htm (choose publications and
„Crowd
Control Technologies")
24) see ref. 23 pg. XIX or 25
25) see ref. 23 pg. LIII or 69
26) see ref. 23 pg. XLVII or 63, aswell pg. VII-VIII or 7-8, pg. XIX or 25,
pg. XLV or
61
27) see ref. 19) pg. LIII or 69, note 354
28) http://www.unog.ch/unidir/Media%20Guide%20 CAHRA and Cheryl Welsh are
listed at the page 24
29) Document sent by Moscow Committee of Ecology of Dwellings. Telephone:
Russian Federation, Zelenograd, 531-6411, Emilia Tschirkova, directrice
30) Search www.rambler.ru , there "poisk" (search) and search for
"gosudarstvennaja
duma" (State Duma) (it is necessary to type in Russian alphabet), at the
page which
appears choose "informacionnyj kanal gosudarstvennoj dumy" (Informational
Channel of the Russian State Duma), there "federalnyje zakony podpisanyje
prezidentom RF" (Federal laws signed by president of the Russian
Federation),
choose year 2001 and search 26 ijulja, c. N 103-F3 (July 26, 2001, number N
103-
F3) , "O vnesenii dopolnenija v statju 6 federalnogo zakona ob oru˛ii"
(addendum
to the article 6 of the Federal law on weapons)
31) Search www.rambler.ru and then (type in Russian alphabet)
"gosudarstvennaja
duma", next "informacionnyj kanal gosudarstvennoj dumy" (informational
channel
of the State Duma), next search by use of "poisk" (search) Doktrina
informacionnoj
bezopasnosti Rossii" "Doctrine of the Informational Security of the Russian
Federation) there see pg. 3 "Vidy informacionnych ugroz bezopasnosti
Rossijskkoj
federacii" (Types of Threats to the Informational Security of the Russian
Federation)
32) See ref. 31, pg. 19, "Me˛dunarodnoje sotrudnicestvo Rossijskoj
Federacii v oblasti
obespecenija informacionnoj bezopasnoti" (International Cooperation of the
Russian Federation in Assuring the Informational Security"
33) See ref.23, pg. XVII or 33
34) See ref.23, pg. XLV or 61
35) See ref.23 pg. XLVI or 62
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: icann-europe-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: icann-europe-help@lists.fitug.de