[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [atlarge-discuss] Limited mandate for interim panel

Well, Jamie, I think outreach and a better election format are the big
things we need from y'all. Some stuff off the top of my head:

 . pull some strings
 . make some calls
 . write some mail
 . improve the website
 . see about getting dual membership included for ISOC, etc. members so
they can vote in our elections
 . get Slashdot, Kuro5hin, etc. coverage
 . integrate mailing list and website better
 . etc.

 . better authentication than Mail From:, at least as an option! (in a
questionable election, this is helpful in narrowing the possible
 . Browser-based SSL voting
 . see [Outreach]

On Sun, 2002-05-05 at 23:20, James Love wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joop Teernstra" <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>
> > The time for the next election is set. (27 July)
> I personally don't think it is good to hold elections when many will be on
> vaction.  If we could do this sooner, it would be good.  Plus, as lame ducks
> (a tempory board), we don't have much authority, and the new board can speak
> more confidently.    I think it would be better to more the date of the
> election up.
> Jamie
> --------------------------------
> James Love mailto:james.love@cptech.org
> http://www.cptech.org +1.202.387.8030 mobile +1.202.361.3040
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de

This is a digitally signed message part