[atlarge-discuss] T.R. had a coffee this morning.

[Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>]

Congratulations.  We now have a "what does Thomas Roessler do or  
think" thread across no less than three mailing lists, it seems.   
That's a really sensible use of everyone's time and bandwidth.  May 
I suggest that you focus on issues instead of people?

To make this abundantly clear: I have some views on what tools are  
more (or less) appropriate for the GA (votes are not, open polls  
are; as far as substantial topics are concerned).  I have these  
views for a reason.  This reason does not apply to an at-large  
membership - the opposite is true: Votes _are_ an appropriate tool  
for an at-large membership organization.  But then again, I'm not  
going to stop you (in fact, how should I even do that?) from using  
open polls if you prefer that.  Thus, it seems like we are in  
"violent agreement" on the substance of what I said, as far as the 
at-large membership is concerned.


On 2002-05-30 21:40:32 -0400, Micheal Sherrill wrote:

>Thomas Roessler has just given us his personal goals.

No.

On 2002-05-31 01:23:53 -0400, Micheal Sherrill wrote:

>We would all profit by thinking through what we want to say before 
>touching the keyboard. 

Yes, indeed.

-- 
Thomas Roessler                          http://log.does-not-exist.org/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de