[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [atlarge-discuss] web page and election



Jamie and Joop,

Why in the hell do you do it?

The abuse, the time, the seeming futility.

And why has the panels' enthusiasm and progress dropped to a small pebble in an
ocean?
Who is the leader of the panel?  Who has been given which tasks?  Are you running
this like a club or a business?  Who is the CEO and who is the Secretary? who is
in charge of elections and who in charge of by-laws?

I want to go get you some money but to what end?  How have you organized
yourselves into a functioning body?

Who will step up and be someone that takes the reins and steers this stagecoach.

Get together and vote a leader and then segregate specific tasks and get them
done or resign.

Sincerely,
Eric

Joop Teernstra wrote:

> On 09:37 a.m. 11/06/2002 -0400, James Love said:
> >1.  Can the current icannatlarge.com webmaster (if we still have one),
> >create a section in the web page, for the next election?
>
> It is there, in the Forum. But I can add a new section on the main website
> under "voting" as soon as the Panel has decided on the election dates.
> (Nomination open/close and elections open/close, plus the how and where of
> the voting process)
>
> As soon as the nominations are closed, The list of nominees and their
> details can be entered under the VOTING header.
>
> >2.   Who has the list members email addresses from the last election?   Is
> >that already part of the announce list rooster?
>
> Several people have this list. The announce list is about 100 members
> shorter: it contains only those members who have ticked the "receive
> announcements" box.
>
> >3.    Can we set up a section on the web page to allow people to nominate
> >candidates?
>
> It is there. http://www.icannatlarge.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=15
>
> >  Last time it only took one second and an acceptance to be put
> >on the ballot.   Should we follow the same system?
>
> I think so.
>
> >4.     Should we assume that there will be 7 persons elected, under the same
> >non region approach we took last time?
>
> That is the least complicated. Voters are always free  to support
> candidates based on their region.
>
> >5.    Should we limit the number of votes cast to 3 like last time?
>
> I see that as an unnecessary  limitation of the members' voting rights. Why
> not seven votes, when we have seven slots.
> Then each voter can vote for his preferred team.
>
> --Joop
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de