[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [atlarge-discuss] Debate
- To: eric@hi-tek.com
- Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] Debate
- From: Sotiris Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 01:43:30 -0400
- CC: "atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de" <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- Delivered-To: mailing list atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
- List-Help: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
- Organization: Hermes Network, Inc.
- References: <3D1BED19.349BFF92@hi-tek.com>
eric@hi-tek.com wrote:
> I would like to know any candidates position on a few matters.
>
> 1. Do they think we should continue with a useful purpose outside of
> ICANN?
Yes.
>
> 2. Should we continue to work in the ICANN arena?
Yes.
>
> 3. Should we be electing people that are not affiliated with ICANN?
Emphatically YES!
>
> 4. Should we immediately disqualify from the new election anyone who
> is on the interim panel?
Good idea!
>
> 5. Who is actively seeking this position?
Not I. I have better things to do with my time than be stymied in my
efforts by spin-mongers, cronies, and Joop.
> This is important and if
> someone lies about it, it becomes more important.
> I am not asking for rules but public debate over who would be best to
> vote for, in our interests.
> If a candidate cannot answer these questions then they are in no
> position to be elected.
Here hear!
Sotiris Sotiropoulos
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de