Re: [atlarge-discuss] More accepted nominees needed!

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

On 12:15 p.m. 19/07/2002 +0200, Alexander Svensson said:

>Hello Norbert,
>
>sorry fot the late response! Since I have heard no objection
>from my fellow watchdogs, here is the answer:
>
>At 18.07.2002 10:13, Norbert Klein wrote:
> >Alexander,
> >
> >can you please elaborate on "secondments"
> >
> >1. are the necessary to make a nomination valid?
> >2. is a secondment required before a nominated candidate can accept or 
> deciline a nomination?
>
>The final version of the Election Charter mentions
>seconds, but does not require them for making nominations
>valid or for accepting/declining a nomination.
>
>However, according to the Election Charter, the nominators
>must "nominate other members". If taken literally, this
>means that a single self-nomination is not sufficient and
>that a self-nominee needs at least one additional
>supporter.

Alexander,

I was under the impression that a second is always needed, since that is 
what we practiced the first time and I have mentioned this on the website.

Do you want me to change that?


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de