[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [atlarge-discuss] (fwd) Urgent input needed for ERC on At-Large ***please respond by Monday morning***
- To: <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- Subject: RE: [atlarge-discuss] (fwd) Urgent input needed for ERC on At-Large ***please respond by Monday morning***
- From: "Bruce Young" <Bruce@barelyadequate.info>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 20:59:56 -0700
- Delivered-To: mailing list atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
- Importance: Normal
- In-Reply-To: <DPEOJECBMOLLLJOFDNDPGEHJCLAA.jo-uk@rcn.com>
- List-Help: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
Both Joanna and Richard Henderson made good points here. We should be
willing to work ICANN, but only if they are willing to deal fairly with all
commers. I also agree that the organization representative that make up an
internal At Large body be allowed to organize their own processes. I also
like Richards's idea that representation be based on membership numbers.
Bruce Young
Portland, Oregon USA
bruce@barelyadequate.info
http://www.barelyadequate.info
--------------------------------------------
Support democratic control of the Internet!
Go to http://www.icannatlarge.com and Join ICANN At Large!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de