Re: [atlarge-discuss] My rough proposals for the ALAC

["John C. A. Bambenek" <sununixguru@yahoo.com>]

I would actually think a better way would be to establish working
groups for certain topic areas, have them beat around a proposal until
they've reached consensus, and then submit it to the membership as a
whole for ratification.

This way interested parties can develop ideas with the help of
interested members, and develop a solid deliverable which could then be
ratified, or slightly modified.  Sorta similar to how IETF works with
the RFC process...

Just a thought...

j
--- Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz> wrote:
> At 02:20 p.m. 20/07/2002 +0100, Richard Henderson wrote:
> 
> You are on the right track, Richard.
> Our Charter should enshrine the right of interpellation (of our
> elected 
> leaders) that each member has and it should define a mechanism to put
> it in 
> action.
> An easy automated Polling system is essential.
> Questions should be submitted at least once a month to achieve wide 
> membership participation.
> 
> --Joop
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
http://health.yahoo.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de