Re: [atlarge-discuss] ALOC archives?

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Danny and all stakeholers or other interested parties,

  I tend to agree with you Danny that stakeholders/users, regardless
of status should at the very least be on an equal footing with
respect to representation in any At-Large structure to elect
at least 51% of the ICANN BoD which was polled by the
than ALSC participants as well as many other stakeholders/users.

DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:

> Sotiris,
>
> I do have ideas for the ERC, but I question whether they will be supported by
> the folks here...
>
> I prefer an in-your-face approach.  Why should the ccTLDs get an SO and the
> ability to elect directors, but not the user community?  Why should the
> special interest groups that populate the DNSO get to elect directors, but
> not us?
>
> I would demand nothing less than an SO.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 124k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de