Re: [atlarge-discuss] Issues

[eric@hi-tek.com]

We have taken this notion a step further and have tested and implemented an
automated  thirty day, two week and one week warning system.  Also names will be
listed on an expiration board that acts like a ticker warning. Then it becomes
an "online transparent first come first serve". Our alpha puts the inquiry load
capacity at over several million per day, of course we will increase this as we
move along.

Redemption Grace Period should be implemented during the time of registration
not afterwards.
But again I suggest that registrations should be handled by professionals not
end users, unless they are the same.  I am a strategist and I do not own a name
because I let my ISP take care of all that and have contracted for that service.

Sincerely,
Eric

Bruce Young wrote:

> Alexander Svensson wrote:
>
> >We *should* have an opinion on the Redemption Grace Period and those
> >who don't even know what that is should get up to speed (again, I'm
> >not referring to Joop -- I'm sure he knows).
>
> I fully support the Redemption Grace Period concept.  It's one of the few
> recent decisions to come out of ICANN recently that I *do* support!  :)  But
> I don't feel it goes far enough.  I think a registrar should be required to
> notify via e-mail the domain holder of record say 30 days before its due to
> expire.
>
> Bruce Young
> Portland, Oregon USA
> bruce@barelyadequate.info
> http://www.barelyadequate.info
> --------------------------------------------
> Support democratic control of the Internet!
> Go to http://www.icannatlarge.com and Join ICANN At Large!
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de