Re: [atlarge-discuss] Auerbach v ICANN - Karl Won

["Richard Henderson" <richardhenderson@ntlworld.com>]

13. I would like to know the precise nature and content of exchanges that
took place between ICANN Board members, and with Afilias Board and/or
executives and/or staff regarding: the development of the Sunrise process;
the action to be taken in response to complaints last summer and autumn that
the Sunrise process was being abused; the calls for intervention to protect
Landrush customers; the calls for investigation of accredited registrars
like Yesnic who submitted ineligible Trademark Data for up to or over 200
Sunrise registrations; the complaints about the Afilias CEO and his
Registrar company in the Sunrise process; other matters pertaining to the
Afilias .info debacle

14. I would like to know the precise nature and content of exchanges that
took place between ICANN Board members, and with Afilias Board and/or
executives and/or staff, and with Neulevel regarding: the abuse of process
in .biz2B; the alleged "warehousing" of names by certain registrars in
.biz2B; the use of "exclusive" lists in .biz2B which excluded the public;
the restriction of lists to single applicants in .biz2B; and also the
warnings and questions raised with Dan Halloran and also posted to Vint Cerf
and Stuart Lynn, concerning the likelihood of a repeat of these problems in
.info LR2 (which warning was apparently ignored but was fulfilled when the
same things did, indeed, happen in .info LR2) - it is now 80 days since Dan
Halloran was asked 14 serious questions on these matters and he STILL hasn't
had the courtesy to reply either to the original or to repeated copies of
the same; did the Board advise or instruct him not to respond? Did the Board
take ANY recorded action to address the problems or were the concerns
entirely overlooked?

Richard Henderson
----- Original Message -----
From: J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin <jefsey@club-internet.fr>
To: <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 10:01 AM
Subject: RE: [atlarge-discuss] Auerbach v ICANN - Karl Won


> On 07:53 30/07/02, Joanna Lane said:
> >1. On Conflict of Interest Issues: Which Directors and /or their
immediate
> >families were shareholders in VeriSign stock immediately prior to the
> >approval of the VeriSign Contract regarding.com?
> >2. How much has ICANN spent on defending the Auerbach lawsuit so far?
> >3. Who is the .org consultant?
> >4. Has Jones Day provided a breakdown of their charges for legal services
to
> >ICANN or on what basis do they charge exactly?
>
> 5. On Dec 2000 which stocks were owned by Directors (who did not step
down)
> and their family in each of the 7 accepted TLDs related companies.
> 6. I am interested in every note and record between board members and
Staff
> and Staff and JDRP
> 7. I am interested in every exchange between Staff and VeriSign,
> particularly regarding Plan B
> 8. I am interested in every exchange between Staff, BoD and JDRP regarding
> the revision of the ICANN status and the visits of Joe Sims in Brussels
and
> relations with EU
> 8. I am interested in every exchange regarding the pre-agreement between
> GAC and Staff/BoD regarding the country names.info prior to he delegation
> of .info
> 9. I am interested in every exchange regarding the ".eu" delegation
> 10. I am interested in every exchanged between Staff, BoD Members, persons
> of the public, JDRP, ALSC, ERC regarding the @large
> 11. Esther reporting the Denise compromises between Staff and BoD, I am
> interested in any mail reflecting the positions of BoD and Staff sent to
> Dneise (and incidently where she sent the form I am to receive as
france@large)
> 12. I am interested in understanding what the ICANN reports to taxes ad
> charity, educational and resarch and under which legal frabchise it acts
to
> support illegal activites such as the support of services to terrorist
> countries according to the US Law.
> etc...
>
>
>
>
> >6.
> >
> >I'm sure you can do better than this, please feel free to add questions.
> >
> >Regards,
> >Joanna
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: j.oppenheimer@att.net [mailto:j.oppenheimer@att.net]
> > > Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 5:18 PM
> > > To: ICANN AT LARGE LIST
> > > Subject: [atlarge-discuss] Auerbach v ICANN - Karl Won
> > >
> > >
> > > http://www.lextext.com/icann/index.html
> > >
> > > :-)
> > >
> > > --
> > > Judith Oppenheimer
> > > http://JudithOppenheimer.com
> > > http://ICBTollFreeNews.com
> > > http://WhoSells800.com
> > > 212 684-7210, 1 800 The Expert
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
> > >
> >
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> >For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
> >
> >
> >
> >---
> >Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> >Version: 6.0.380 / Virus Database: 213 - Release Date: 24/07/02
>
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----


> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de