[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [atlarge-discuss] 006 Deciding Name for Organisation



On 10:01 a.m. 9/08/2002 -0700, Lawrence Solum said:
I endorse Hans's approach.

Remember that the at-large community faces what economists call a
collective action problem.  The wider the focus, the worse this problem
will become.
I have to agree. Our first focus should very strongly be on "creating a representative structure". This should be the work of a small group of professionals/volunteers, open , but not too tolerant about disruption.

When this work is done and ratified by all members, we can then insert our representatives where it currently matters: Icann.

We must focus on a Constitution document that protects our Members from "representatives" acting without mandate and draft articles that give the members the right and the procedures to get rid of such representatives in short order and elect better ones.
If people will say IDNO2, then all I can say is: benefit from the mistakes of the past, so that we are not forced to repeat history.

We will probably have to go through several elections before all members have found comfort and trust with the procedures.



--Joop


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de