[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [atlarge-discuss] Current suggestions list of new names/DN's for our group..
> I'm with you here too. AND, I'd still like to see it up (and
> out), but for
> just one month! It would announce the break, get a lot of
> need publicity
> and mileage, and then we'd drop it.
Yes, a transitional tool, just for as long as its needed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
Judith Oppenheimer
http://JudithOppenheimer.com
http://ICBTollFreeNews.com
http://WhoSells800.com
212 684-7210, 1 800 The Expert
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
Visit 1-800 AFTA, http://www.1800afta.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joey Borda **star*walker** [mailto:starwalker@gay.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 1:56 PM
> To: Richard Henderson; Judith Oppenheimer
> Cc: atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
> Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] Current suggestions list of new
> names/DN's for our group..
>
>
> Wednesday, August 14, 2002 * 1:45 PM EDT USA
>
> At 09:58 AM 8/14/2002 +0100, Richard Henderson wrote:
>
> >I personally prefer putting the emphasis on World rather
> than Internet
> >because it states in our name the biggest aspect of our
> argument : that
> >there's a whole world of people who have a right in this - I go with
> >www.worldatlarge.org
>
> Richard, today the Internet, tomorrow the world! ;-)
>
> I happen to agree with you, and think in time we'll get
> there. We ought to
> have the name "in the bank" in the meantime. I think right now
> InternetAtLarge strikes the interim balance we've talked back
> and forth
> about. Not too much, not too little. Goldilocks would be so tickled.
>
> >I didn't like the clenched fist logo and I don't personally
> favour anything
> >negative in our logo. I'd also prefer to keep absolute clear
> distance from
> >ICANN and I wouldn't want to even afford them the honour of
> a crossed out
> >name. We should regard the ICANN name as contemptible and it
> should not
> >besmirch our logo
>
> I'm with you here too. AND, I'd still like to see it up (and
> out), but for
> just one month! It would announce the break, get a lot of
> need publicity
> and mileage, and then we'd drop it. Kind of like the colonies
> dumping the
> Union Jack, and then bringing out their own flag.
>
> /s/ Joey
>
> =====
> Put your action where your... err... speech is!
> -----
> Support democratic operation of the Internet! Go to
> http://www.icannatlarge.com and Join ICANN At Large!
> ---
> Then create your personal volunteer profile
> at http://www.icannatlarge.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=19 and
> tell everyone
> what you have done, and/or can do, and/or are willing to do
> -- NOW! :-)
> -----
> (Please at least book mark the above links.)
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de