RE: [atlarge-discuss] Satyajit responds...

["Judith Oppenheimer" <joppenheimer@icbtollfree.com>]

>  I am getting tired of responding ad nauseum... But I shall
> be polite,

He's not responded (and if he doesn't wish to he should just say so.)  And
he's certainly not being polite.

Contrary to Satyajit's repeated ad nauseum accusations, YJ suggested
*trying* teleconferences.

One was held - only one.  It was attended by fewer than half the panel, and
therefore discarded as impractical.  It was never a controversial matter.

But Satyajit has hauled out these mysterious "teleconferences" not once but
twice to complain that he wasn't allowed to participate here (!).

He's now doing it again, crying "teleconferences" to distract and unfairly
attack YJ, rather than address a civil question placed before him merely
asking that he substantively explain the discrepancy between his campaign
promise and his recent vote.

Satyajit can vote for who he wishes.  And at large members can remember his
actions and choices when they next vote for panelists or directors of this
group.

But I respectfully suggest that any further communications with him on this
matter are a waste of this group's time.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
Judith Oppenheimer
http://JudithOppenheimer.com
http://ICBTollFreeNews.com
http://WhoSells800.com
212 684-7210, 1 800 The Expert
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
Visit 1-800 AFTA, http://www.1800afta.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Satyajit Gupta [mailto:icheckemail@indiatimes.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 9:25 AM
> To: atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
> Subject: [atlarge-discuss] Satyajit responds...
>
>
>
>  Dear YJ,
>
>  I am getting tired of responding ad nauseum... But I shall
> be polite, and state that my views and goals remain unchanged
> as regards my striving for the rights of the 'common netizen'
> and the NCDNHC.
>
>  But if you look at what you stand for - namely opposing the
> co-ordination of cyberspace ( Please see
> http://www.icannatlarge.com/candidatespage.htm#10 ), I doubt
> that you concretely and creatively represent either the
> 'common netizen' or the NCDNHC.
>
>  Further, by pushing through tele-conferences for Panel
> deliberations, you have shown that you have scant regard for
> people who cannot afford to use the medium.
>
>  I request that you stop fishing for opposition.
>
>  Warm regards,
>
>  Satyajit.
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from Indiatimes at
> http://email.indiatimes.com
>
>  Buy Music, Video, CD-ROM, Audio-Books and Music Accessories
> from http://www.planetm.co.in
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de