[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [atlarge-discuss] RE: [atlarge-panel] FW: [ga] icannatlarge.com
> Judith,
> Thank you for bringing this to everybody's' attention.
> In view of the seriousness of John Berryhill's remarks, the Watchdogs are
> discussing the possible impact of this unforeseen development on the
> current
> vote to choose the organization name. The Panel may also wish to discuss
> the
> impact of John's remarks on current website content.
>
> Regards,
> Joanna
OK - it has to be discussed. But for me this is another challenge to stay
with ICANNATLARGE.
I got some inquiries from people whom I had motivated to become members of
this list - they ask me if we are now giving up to work towards gaining a
voice in ICANN as we wote to maybe change the name (while the change from .com
to .org would be only a minor change).
I am still motivated - and more so when a trademark consideration warns us
that we may be out - to keep ICANN clearaly on our flag, and speak up with
what we think ICANN should be. And if ICANN really should deny us to say in our
name what we stand for - well, that too would speak clearly.
Norbert
--
Norbert Klein
Open Forum of Cambodia: www.forum.org.kh
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de