[atlarge-discuss] Fwd: RE: [atlarge-panel] FW: [ga] icannatlarge.com

[Vivek Durai <vivek@vivekdurai.com>]

Mr. John Berryhill "Ph.D. J.D." needs to do a little more research and reading 
of UDRP precedents before coming to such conclusions. His attention may *also* 
be directed to <http://www.at-large.org/>, an official ICANN website which 
recognises this group as the only existing worldwide at-large structure in 
respect of ICANN. While Mr. Berryhill might like to point out the finer aspects 
of the law by quoting the rev. Vint Cerf, it may also be kept in mind that we 
have no duty to ensure that the dealings of ICANN staff or individual directors 
have been duly authorised by the company. But I would like this discussion to 
remain on the GA list.

Joanna....berryhill or not, the vote proceeds.The watchdogs are advised that 
they have no mandate to modify the ballot. While I am not in favor of the name 
icannatlarge.com, I am also not in favor of ad-hoc working methods. The vote 
must proceed unhindered. The panelists (sleeping, et al) are requested to state 
their positions.

Regards,

Vivek Durai

>
> Quoting Judith Oppenheimer <joppenheimer@icbtollfree.com>:
>
> > John Berryhill, an eminent trademark attorney, posted this
> today on the GA
> > list:
> >
> > > ICANNatlarge.com is not authorized by or affiliated with
> ICANN, and its
> > use
> > > of ICANN trademarks is misleading, deceptive and
> dilutive.  You either
> > have a
> > > license or you don't, and it is clear that you don't.
> >
> >
> > http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga-full/Arc11/msg00436.html ,
> > http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga-full/Arc11/msg00438.html , and
> > http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga-full/Arc11/msg00453.html
> eloquently
> > written by Joanna.
> >
> > What a jolting reminder that "participating within the
> ICANN process" is
> > not an exercise in self determination or even self organization.
> >
> > Mr. Berryhill writes:
> >
> > > keep up the good work, since if ICANN does not act to enforce its
> > > federally registered trademarks, then it will lose them.
> >
> > I'm not a lawyer, but I suppose it could also hold this organization
> > hostage to the trademark, using it to either keep us in
> line, or put us out
> > of business.
> >
> > And all this time I was only worried about the bad smell
> associated with
> > the name!
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------
> > ----------
> > Judith Oppenheimer
> > http://JudithOppenheimer.com
> > http://ICBTollFreeNews.com
> > http://WhoSells800.com
> > 212 684-7210, 1 800 The Expert
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------
> > ----------
> > Visit 1-800 AFTA, http://www.1800afta.org
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------
> > ----------
> >
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-panel-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> > For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-panel-help@lists.fitug.de
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>




----- End forwarded message -----




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de