[atlarge-discuss] Point of order Re: [atlarge-discuss] icannatlarge.com

[espresso@e-scape.net]

At 22:19 -0700 2002/09/23, Jeff Williams wrote:
>> What Joanna, Walter and Bruce did was entirely appropriate, given the
>> advice of private counsel and the extraordinary circumstances.
>
>  If you are talking about the specific letter, yes that was appropriate.
>That was decidedly NOT what I have been referring to however.
>As far as I know there has been not advice of record from private
>council either Judyth.  If so, I would have to say that that council
>should not overly influence any panel decision.  If they do, than
>such a decision effects the members.  As such we should have a vote
>on such actions that are of a result...

That was Judith Oppenheimer, not Judyth (me). I'm already on record as believing the move to alter the ballot during voting was a serious procedural error, however understandable individuals' fears of litigation might be, and that the degree of risk perceived was far in excess of the probabilities anyhow.

Regards,

Judyth (with a "y")

##########################################################
Judyth Mermelstein     "cogito ergo lego ergo cogito..."
Montreal, QC           <espresso@e-scape.net>
##########################################################
"A word to the wise is sufficient. For others, use more."
##########################################################



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de