Re: [atlarge-discuss] Constitution

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

I agree with Ron, even though he hurt my feelings.
The name and sophistry is missplaced.
I kind of like the context
e

Ron Sherwood wrote:

> A rose by any other name...  smells as sweet.
>
> Those who live in the belief that only the dictionary that they are familiar with is correct, are bound to fail the test of international communications.
>
> I happen to believe that What David wrote from NZ is valid and legal in NZ.  The job of our Panel is couch a "Constitution" or whatever is chosen as its title, in terms that are as universally acceptable as possible, and legal in the jurisdiction in which we choose to incorporate.
>
> To claim that the title is incorrect simply demonstrates the intellectual limitations off the claimant.
>
> Please let us judge this draft document, and any others that are presented, by the value and relevance of their content and not by the language limitations of the reader.
>
> Constitution,  a : the basic principles and laws of a nation, state, or social group that determine the powers and duties of the government and guarantee certain rights to the people in it b : a written instrument embodying the rules of a political or social organization.
>
>     Do we not see ourselves as a political or social organization that should have a written instrument embodying the rules by which we operate?
>
> Ron


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de