Re: [atlarge-discuss] good stuff on the comment lines

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Joop and all,

  The answer to Richards question I am sure will be predominantly No.

  There is really no need to have such a question posed except for
documentation purposes.  The history of ICANN Atlarge representation
is pretty well known, and well documented.  It is, and remains a sham...

Joop Teernstra wrote:

> http://www.icannatlarge.com/results-henderson3.htm
>
> Under Richard's question about trusting the motives behind ICANN's at Large
> structure an anonymous voter proposed this rephrase:
>
> Do you believe that an ICANN controlled/initiated @large will be effective
> and beneficial to the internet Users?
>
> Not the same question but certainly also one worth posing.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 129k members/stakeholders strong!)
================================================================
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de