[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [atlarge-discuss] Impersonal processes Re: [Fwd: [atlarge-discuss] WHAT MOSTMEMBERS WANT]
Agreed, but abiding by statements and making true on comitments is
probably just as important. These folks garnering votes in order to be
appointed to ICANN groups is disgusting. Yes I stand by the idea of
bending to the will of the people, but that is mighty different than
having a preset agenda to abandon them.
e
> Richard Henderson wrote:
>
> | In order for that to happen, there has to be definition of the
> | specific work
> | we want achieved - and I really believe that definition can only |
> be arrived
> | at by the sanction (and participation) of the broad membership.
>
> I totally agree. That was the my motivation to request questions from
> the mem,bership that we can include on the ballot. That way we not
> only get a new panel, but we also get an idea of the will of the
> membership that they can use to focus their actions.
>
> | So I advocate: elections (with a built in accountability to the |
> membership) --- polling to define needs and objectives --- then | the
> priority
> | of carrying out those objectives, preferably tied down to agreed
> time | limits.
>
> I agree.
>
> Bruce Young
> Portland, Oregon USA
> bruce@barelyadequate.info
> http://www.barelyadequate.info
> --------------------------------------------
> Support democratic control of the Internet!
> Go to http://www.icannatlarge.org and Join ICANN At Large!
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de For
> additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de