Re: [atlarge-discuss] Tainted election? Proof!!!

[DannyYounger@cs.com]

Re:  << If you have any *provable* allegations about how this election is 
being conducted, then bring 'em on!   >>


Hello Bruce,

One can only assume that you approve of the following:

1.  A member of the three-person panel conducting the election decides to 
muck up the election by nominating 68 people even though there are only 11 
seats to fill and even though he was supposed to remain "neutral" in the 
election process.  

2.  Even though the rules specified that "You should have a reasonable 
expectation that the person(s) you nominate will be willing to serve, and 
have the best interests of this organization at heart", this panelist 
nominated individuals such as Esther Dyson, Mike Roberts, and Marilyn Cade 
that never in a million years would have the best interests of this 
organization at heart or would be willing to serve (turning the nomination 
process into a joke).

3.  This panelist then proceeds to second every nomination that he himself 
has made in order to send out nomination acknowledgements to his own list of 
candidates.

4.  The panelist further admits to conspiring with another party to second 
any other nomination that comes through even if the panelist doesn't even 
know the party being nominated.

5.  Instead of abiding by the established rules and only accepting 
nominations posted either to the discussion list or in reply to the 
announcement message, this panelist then claims that the Polling Committee 
(whatever that is) has agreed to also accept nominations posted at other 
venues.  Somehow, the other Panelists seem to know nothing about this 
agreement.

6.  Nominations are noted at other venues such at the icannatlarge.com 
website, and Joop transmits the details as a matter of courtesy to the 
discussion list --  and then those nominations fail to be properly recorded.

7.  The matter is brought to the attention of your Panelist Jefsey, who then 
claims to have sent out a new batch of nomination confirmations, but of 
course we have no watchdogs to verify or confirm that any of this has been 
done.

Do you require the confirming URLs for each of these points, or have you been 
paying attention?  

The problem is not "members who can't follow simple f@#$ing instructions".
The problem is a panelist that does whatever the hell he wants to while his 
fellow panelists are sleeping.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de