Re: [atlarge-discuss] Questions for each candidate

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Danny and all fellow members,

  Most of your questions here are very good ones for ANY member
of this organization.  I would take exception with your last question
however.

  It is obvious that only a VERY FEW members here have participated
in ICANN related forums, comment periods, or attended ANY internet
related USG or any other government meetings dealing with Internet
issues or policies.  It is fairly obvious that very few members here
have the financial ability to attend any of these meetings or are
willing to take their own time to do so either.

  The funding problem for attending such meetings for any potential
representative can be solved with a good funding model, which I
have harped on.  However to elect anyone at this juncture to
take on that expense from our members with a very few exceptions
would be a burden beyond reason.  However "Panel" members
are of course NOT representatives even though our previous
Ex-Panel members tried to take it upon themselves to be such,
hence leading to their demise and now a need for a honest and
legitimate election.

  So Danny although your questions are very good ones for
actual representatives of the members, they seem to be worded
in such a way as to be premature or not applicable for "Panel"
or potential new "Panel" members.  Perhaps  you may view or
consider such "New Panel" members as actual representatives
for the members?

DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:

> 1.  Do you intend to support the formation of Regional At-Large Organizations
> (RALOs) as enumerated in the ICANN bylaws?  Why, or why not?
>
> 2.  Which DNS issue is most important to you?  What policy change would you
> recommend to the ICANN Board with respect to that issue?
>
> 3.  How many At-Large directors should be seated on the ICANN Board?  What
> strategy do you recommend to accomplish that goal?
>
> 4.  Will you participate in lobbying the U.S. Department of Commerce to
> formally re-bid the ICANN contracts?
>
> 5.  ICANN constituencies are required to submit a new charter and statement
> of operating procedures no later than 15 July 2003.  Will you commit to this
> same goal for this organization within the same timeframe?
>
> 6.  It costs money to run any organization.  How do you intend to fund this
> organization?
>
> 7.  In your view, what is the mission of this organization?  How do you
> intend to accomplish that mission?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 129k members/stakeholders strong!)
================================================================
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de