Re: [atlarge-discuss] demand agenda

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

Irresponsibility is in the man or woman that speaks too much.
Privacy and openess are birds of a different color.
Anyone that says they are not is flying to a different agenda, probably 
there own.  If they speak let them speak what their agenda is, and then 
proceed not just attack those who speak in admiration of others.

Let us not attack Mr. Williams but let us demand his agenda.

> Eric and all fellow members,
> 
> Eric Dierker wrote:
> 
>> It is a tough row to plow between privacy, rules and transparency.
> 
>   This is an uninformed or just a silly statement Eric.  In either case
> it is certainly irresponsible.  There is NO problem with holding an
> election transparently and still protecting voters privacy.  It is done
> frequently.  I had thought after over 2 years of links and
> documentation that I know you have received on this, that you would
> have learned something substantial.  It is sadly obvious that either
> you did/have not or are simply being silly.
> 
>>
>> ID verification and invasion are inconsistent concepts when it comes
>> to lists.
>> Thank you for your hard work,
>> Eric Dierker
>>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de