Re: [atlarge-discuss] different questions on the Ballot

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

Please write this again as I cannot understand it.

Eric

> Dear Watchdogs,
> 
> We had been assured by Bruce that the *same* questions that were asked
> in  the Polling Booth would also appear on the ballot, so that the
> answers,  coming now via email and checked by the watchdogs, would be
> validated.
> 
> Jefsey is now proposing a  *different* set of questions.
> 
> If I did not want to believe that Jefsey is essentially good willing, I
>  could not think of a better way to sabotage the past Polling outcomes,
>  instead of validating them.
> 
> For example: the Booth question was: Do-all Panel or Division of Power.
> 
> A. Do you want an 11 person Panel with a wide mandate to determine
> website  content, control use of the members' list , Poll the members
> and speak on  your behalf?
> OR
> B. Do you want a division of Power, with different officers with narrow
>  mandates for different functions? (see further options in other voting
> topics)
> 
> 
> Jefsey's question is: - should the Panel be a "do it all" Panel or 
> coordinate different committees?
> If the Panel is "co-ordinating" different committees,  there is no
> option  for a fundamental, capture defeating, division of power.
> The members in majority wanted it, but Jefsey apparently does not.
> 
> I am asking this "Polling Committee" to allow and validate only the 
> questions that have been asked via the Booth, and leave all further
> polling  questions to an elected Polling Commission.
> 
> -joop-
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de For
> additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de