Re: [atlarge-discuss] My Candidacy Information

[Joey Borda **star*walker** <starwalker@gay.com>]

At 06:41 PM 5/24/2003 -0400, Sotiris Sotiropoulos wrote:


> Curtis M. Kularski wrote:
>
> > Not a problem. I used to have a digital certificate, but I seem to have
> > misplaced the key information for it, but I do have a verified paypal
> > account. https://www.paypal.com/verified/pal=paypal%40curtis.kularski.us.
> >
> > If you need any other information, or verification let me know.
> I am letting you know then... I am afraid that you are NOT a verified 
> Paypal member, the Paypal system responded as follows:
>
> paypal@curtis.kularski.us. is NOT PayPal Verified
Sotiris:

In order to view a PayPal Verification apparently you must yourself have a 
PayPal account, which I do. Otherwise an error of some sort is thrown.

I have already examined Curtis' and Mark Pool's PayPal verifications and 
find them to be "in order."

In Curtis' case one finds:

Email: paypal@curtis.kularski.us
Status: Verified
Account Creation Date: March 21, 2001

In Mark's case one finds:

Email: urgen@charter.net
Status: Verified
Account Creation Date: August 31, 2002

Regards,

/s/ Joey/Borda

Saturday, May 24, 2003 * 6:55 PM EDT USA

starwalker@gay.com
starwalker@starwalker.org
Yahoo! Messenger ID: starwalkeratgaydotcom

> What it Means to be Verified
>
> To become Verified, a PayPal member must provide us with proof that he or 
> she has opened an account at a bank or other financial institution. 
> Because these institutions are required by law to screen account holders, 
> PayPal's verification process increases security when you pay parties you 
> do not know. Please note that PayPal's verification system does not 
> constitute an endorsement of a member, nor a guarantee of a member's 
> business practices. You should always consider other indicators when 
> evaluating members, including length of PayPal membership and reputation 
> scores (on eBay or other auction sites, if applicable)."
>
> That's the message I got on your Paypal account.  So, I am afraid you're 
> going to have to do better, "Curtis".
>
> --Sotiris Sotiropoulos
>
> -----------
>
> "The science of jurisprudence regards the state and power as the
> ancients regarded fire- namely, as something existing absolutely.
> But for history, the state and power are merely phenomena, just as for
> modern physics fire is not an element but a phenomenon.
>
> From this fundamental difference between the view held by history
> and that held by jurisprudence, it follows that jurisprudence can tell
> minutely how in its opinion power should be constituted and what
> power- existing immutably outside time- is, but to history's questions
> about the meaning of the mutations of power in time it can answer
> nothing."
>                                      --Leo Tolstoy, "War and Peace"
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de