[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [atlarge-discuss] Watchdog members



On Wed, 28 May 2003, Joanna Lane wrote:

> I believe one of the mistakes being made in this election, is not
> forwarding the ballots in their raw state to Watchdogs, instead
> stripping them of any ID. This severely restricts the watchdog's ability
> to double check the count, or checking ballots against the valid
> membership list, and so on. I would say that the watchdogs seem to be
> largely a symbolic gesture rather than fulfilling any meaningful role...

   ...what Joanna said, and...

As someone who in the past was a watchdog (but would not be one now, under
the conditions given us), and knowing the details of the watchdog process,
I again ask the current watchdogs to explain to us, all, exactly what they
are doing, and how that is a meaningful process.

--

 ---  REgards, walts@dorsai.org  Walter C. Schmidt, IT CPA  Blue(^) ---
 - -   Microsoft MVP - Windows XP Media Center Edition - HPMC 873n  ---
 - -                 Associate Expert - Expert Zone                 - -
 ---         http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone/         ---
 - - http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone/columns/schmidt/ ---
 - - 52 Ken           http://www.dorsai.org/~walts/          Sun 57 - -


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de