[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [atlarge-discuss] Watchdog members
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Joanna Lane wrote:
> I believe one of the mistakes being made in this election, is not
> forwarding the ballots in their raw state to Watchdogs, instead
> stripping them of any ID. This severely restricts the watchdog's ability
> to double check the count, or checking ballots against the valid
> membership list, and so on. I would say that the watchdogs seem to be
> largely a symbolic gesture rather than fulfilling any meaningful role...
...what Joanna said, and...
As someone who in the past was a watchdog (but would not be one now, under
the conditions given us), and knowing the details of the watchdog process,
I again ask the current watchdogs to explain to us, all, exactly what they
are doing, and how that is a meaningful process.
--
--- REgards, walts@dorsai.org Walter C. Schmidt, IT CPA Blue(^) ---
- - Microsoft MVP - Windows XP Media Center Edition - HPMC 873n ---
- - Associate Expert - Expert Zone - -
--- http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone/ ---
- - http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone/columns/schmidt/ ---
- - 52 Ken http://www.dorsai.org/~walts/ Sun 57 - -
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de