Re: [atlarge-discuss] @LARGE ELECTION: Do you accept your result?

[Sotiris Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>]

Why am I receiving this?  more evidence of the farce referred to as the 
last "election"?

--Sotiris Sotiropoulos

jefsey@club-internet.fr wrote:

> this a private e-mail for Bob Crawford.
> ----- icannatlarge.org -----
>
> Dear Bob,
> The verified results of the icannatlarge.org election are
> displayed at the URL: http://icannatlarge.org/results.htm.
>
> They show you received the support of:
> 39 Members of our organization.
> This places you as nr. 19 in the list of the candidates.
>
> In order to complete the announce of the results, I would
> thank you to let know the atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
> mailing list:
>
> 1. Y/N [ ] if you accept this result.
>
> 2. Y/N [ ] if you accept to participate to the Panel
>   (are/will be elected the 11 first listed canditates after
>   any resignations occuring until a new Panel is elected)
>
> 3. what is the e-mail address I am to quote for the Members
>   to relate with you as a Panelist?
>
> 4. what is the URL I am to quote for your panelist
>   presentation, positions and statements? I currently know:
>   http://execlub.org/bob-crawford.htm
>
> 5. Some candidates have indicated they wanted to stay a
>   Panel Member for only a limited time.
>   Y/N [ ] if you will resign at a determined date?
>   If YES, please indicate when : [../../200.].
>
> This information will be used to complete the result page.
> It will be displayed on the icannatlarge.org site and made
> available to the @large sites and related mailing lists. It
> will probably be quoted by some media and search engines.
>
> I thank you for your cooperation.
> jfc
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>
>  
--
-----------

"The science of jurisprudence regards the state and power as the
ancients regarded fire- namely, as something existing absolutely.
But for history, the state and power are merely phenomena, just as for
modern physics fire is not an element but a phenomenon.

> From this fundamental difference between the view held by history
and that held by jurisprudence, it follows that jurisprudence can tell
minutely how in its opinion power should be constituted and what
power- existing immutably outside time- is, but to history's questions
about the meaning of the mutations of power in time it can answer
nothing."
				     --Leo Tolstoy, "War and Peace"





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de