RE: [atlarge-discuss] Re: @LARGE ELECTION: Do you accept your result?

["Abel Wisman" <abel@able-towers.com>]

If this message by accident was returned to you "off-list" then I am
truly sorry, it was meant to go to the list and nowhere else, I do not
cc people when posting, the change of "to" must have been missed.

The message was meant for the general list and it is there now, thank
you.

Abel




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sotiris Sotiropoulos [mailto:sotiris@hermesnetwork.com] 
> Sent: 05 June 2003 22:41
> To: abel@able-towers.com; At Large Discuss
> Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: @LARGE ELECTION: Do you 
> accept your result?
> 
> 
> I thank you not to send me any more offlist messages.  If you recall, 
> you requested that I not send you any offlist messages, and I have 
> respected your wishes. Why are you being a hypocrite and applying a 
> double standard now?
> 
> --Sotiris Sotiropoulos
> 
> 
> Abel Wisman wrote:
> 
> >And you can morally justify that to yourself ?
> >
> >Let me get this more clear:
> >
> >You denounce the outcome of the vote and,
> >Despite the fact you got less then 25% of the votes, in 
> which case you 
> >agreed not to take a seat on the panel,
> >
> >You still take a seat on the panel ?
> >
> >
> >
> >Abel
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Sotiris Sotiropoulos [mailto:sotiris@hermesnetwork.com]
> >>Sent: 05 June 2003 17:34
> >>To: abel@able-towers.com
> >>Cc: 'atlarge discuss list'
> >>Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: @LARGE ELECTION: Do you 
> >>accept your result?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Abel Wisman wrote:
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >>><SNIP>
> >>>
> >>>I also noted something odd in the one that DID count (below) where
> >>>Sotiris does NOT accept the outcome but DOES accept a place on the 
> >>>panel should he be (he was, 11th) within the first 11 of 
> the elected 
> >>>candidates.
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>The options were not mutually exclusive.  :-)
> >>
> >>--Sotiris Sotiropoulos
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> >>For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> -- 
> -----------
> 
> "The science of jurisprudence regards the state and power as 
> the ancients regarded fire- namely, as something existing 
> absolutely. But for history, the state and power are merely 
> phenomena, just as for modern physics fire is not an element 
> but a phenomenon.
> 
> >From this fundamental difference between the view held by history
> and that held by jurisprudence, it follows that jurisprudence 
> can tell minutely how in its opinion power should be 
> constituted and what
> power- existing immutably outside time- is, but to history's 
> questions about the meaning of the mutations of power in time 
> it can answer nothing."
> 				     --Leo Tolstoy, "War and Peace"
> 
> 
> 
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de