[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [atlarge-discuss] ICANNAtlarge trademark infringement (was   LET'S GET GOING:  Determining a Chair   forthePanel)
Joop Teernstra wrote:
|  I would like to hear the details. Who were the "lawyers"?  All I
|  have seen was an uncharacteristic posting from John Berryhill.
|  Was there more?
John was the one who started the whole thing on the GA list, and I remember
James Tyre being concerned, although claiming that it was less cut and dried
than John claimed.  However I remember at least two others on the GA list
that chimed in claiming gloom and doom. Don't ask me for their names though:
I don't archive any GA messages.  I can see if I archived anything on this
is you like.
|  Is the fear of being sued so strong in the US that people with a
|  just and strong case can be intimidated simply because
|  they cannot afford a defence?
Often, yes.  But as I said, Joanna had much more to lose, due to her
immigration statuis.
|  Are there not penalties awarded for frivolous lawsuits?
Sure.  And lawyers for that cost money, too!
Bruce Young
Portland, Oregon USA
bruce@barelyadequate.info
http://www.barelyadequate.info
--------------------------------------------
Support democratic control of the Internet!
Go to http://www.icannatlarge.org and Join ICANN At Large!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de