[atlarge-discuss] [Fwd: Re: [Panel] [Fwd: Re: [atlarge-discuss] [Fwd: motion #2003-12]]]

[Sotiris Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>]

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Panel] [Fwd: Re: [atlarge-discuss] [Fwd: motion #2003-12]]
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 10:05:14 -0400
From: Sotiris Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>
To: panel@mailman.icannatlarge.org
References: <20030612115936.22632.qmail@web13804.mail.yahoo.com>



Thank you David, I will forward this to the ML for the membership to 
check out the relevant links.

--Sotiris Sotiropoulos

David Goldstein wrote:

> It would be a fairly reasonable to deal with privacy under
> the EU's privacy laws that many countries have had to more
> or less adopt as the EU would not trade with countries that
> did not accept them.
>
> They are also fairly reasonable requirements.
>
> See the following if you are interested:
> -
> http://europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/privacy/index_en.htm
> - http://www.gigalaw.com/articles/privacy-eu.html.
>
> David
> - - 
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos  wrote: > 
>  
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] [Fwd: motion #2003-12]
> > Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 07:06:40 -0400
> > From: Sotiris Sotiropoulos 
> > To: Jeff Holt 
> > CC: 'At Large Discuss' 
> > References: 
> >    
> > Agreed. I will forward your comment to the Panel list for
> > the Secretay 
> > to collate as commentary on the motion.
> >
> > --Sotiris Sotiropoulos
> >
> > Jeff Holt wrote:
> >
> >    
> > > I would second if I could with one point of correction.
> > >      
> > Whoever becomes
> >    
> > > Webmaster, the part about privacy disclosure only to the
> > >      
> > Panel or
> >    
> > > Executive Committee (future Officers) must also include
> > >      
> > the circumstance
> >    
> > > when the organization might be forced to disclose
> > >      
> > information to some
> >    
> > > Legal Authority or Law Enforcement Agency.  This is
> > >      
> > standard "Privacy
> >    
> > > Policy" clause.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > >
> > > Jeff Holt
> > > Jefftttt@txucom.net
> > > www.tejas-info-services.com


--
-----------

"The science of jurisprudence regards the state and power as the
ancients regarded fire- namely, as something existing absolutely.
But for history, the state and power are merely phenomena, just as for
modern physics fire is not an element but a phenomenon.

> From this fundamental difference between the view held by history
and that held by jurisprudence, it follows that jurisprudence can tell
minutely how in its opinion power should be constituted and what
power- existing immutably outside time- is, but to history's questions
about the meaning of the mutations of power in time it can answer
nothing."
				     --Leo Tolstoy, "War and Peace"




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de