Re: [atlarge-discuss] ALAC At-Large Structures

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Ron and all fellow members,

 There is NO Panel or Panel Chairman.  That is just a fantasy
of Jefsey-election farce or possible fraud.  Seek and embrace
the truth, for it shall set you free!

  I am sure that Joop is in near nirvana presently as it has
always been his secret dream to be addressed as "Chairman".
Mao had that same dream.  Mao lived it in near isolation
for many years.  Joop on the other hand tried this same
nonsense with the IDNO.  It folded.  Think about it.

None of this is to say Joop is not without good ideas,
but at the ICANN Santiago meeting he showed his
true colors and intentions.  He knows it, many others here
also know it.  He needs to face it.

Ron Sherwood wrote:

>    Dear Panel Chairman Joop:
>
> Please will you tell the membership which members of the Panel will be
>
> representing us at the ICANN Conference in Montreal.
>
> This organization, or any that cares to admit members (or even one
> member, I
> guess) from outside of the geographical boundaries arbitrarily set by
> ALAC,
> cannot meet the rules as proposed.  This organization, small and
> struggling
> as it may be, already has over a thousand members and probably has
> members
> in every one of the ALAC regions.  By the proposed rules, we would
> have to
> split into 5 separate groups before ALAC would even consider
> recognizing us
> a an @Large organization.
>
> I note here that Sotiris has offered to present my concerns about this
>
> obvious shortcoming of the RALO system at the ALAC meetings, but who
> will
> respond on our behalf to the apparent determination by ALAC to dictate
> which
> @Large groups it will recognize and which it will simply dismiss as
> unacceptable by standards that ALAC itself determines?  Furthermore,
> since
> there appears to already be a vote scheduled for June 26th, at which
> time
> the proposals will be ratified unless changed due to the receipt of
> convincing email input over the next 10 days, or a convincing argument
> at
> the public forum one day before the vote.
>
> If a Panel member (or members) is/are to represent our position on
> these 5
> proposals, what is that position? Has the Panel discussed the issue?
> If so,
> could the results of that discussion be shared with the membership in
> the
> form of an official response for approval or discussion?
>
> Thank you for any information you can provide.
>
> Ron Sherwood
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeff Holt" <jefftttt@txucom.net>
> To: <DannyYounger@cs.com>; <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
> Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 9:18 PM
> Subject: RE: [atlarge-discuss] ICANN Announcement
>
>
> @Large,
>
> How will this organization respond to this obvious attempt to
> discredit
> it before it even has the chance to become a legal entity?  As members
>
> of THIS organization, there should be a huge response to this puppet
> ALAC proposal.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Jeff Holt
> Jefftttt@txucom.net
> www.tejas-info-services.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DannyYounger@cs.com [mailto:DannyYounger@cs.com]
> Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 7:51 PM
> To: atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
> Subject: [atlarge-discuss] ICANN Announcement
>
> http://www.icann.org/montreal/alac-organization-topic.htm
>
> Excerpt:  After consultation with the community, the Interim ALAC has
> forwarded to the ICANN Board five proposals:
>
> 1.  Proposed minimum criteria for At-Large Structures;
> 2.  Proposed certification process for At-Large Structures (ALS);
> 3.  Proposed guidelines for the form of each Regional At-Large
> Organizations'
> (RALOs) Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to be entered into with
> ICANN;
>
> 4.  Proposed procedures for Board review of ALAC certification
> decisions; and
> 5.  Proposed Application for "At-Large Structure" (ALS) Designation.
>
> Public comments on these proposals are invited, either by e-mail sent
> to
>
> <alac-organization-comments@icann.org> or at the ICANN Public Forum to
>
> be held on
> 25 June 2003 in Montréal. Taking into consideration the comments
> received, the
> ICANN Board will consider acting on the proposals at its meeting on 26
>
> June
> 2003.
>

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 131k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
    Pierre Abelard
===============================================================
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de