[atlarge-discuss] RE : [atlarge-discuss] Verification Committee....

["Daniel CHIRITA" <daniel@chirita.org>]

I dont understand: why VC discussions must be closed to public, and Webteam
must be public ???
I know, VC handles personal data, but Webteam handles informations about
website,
code, passwords, and other informations which must remain private, for
security raisons ;)
I think both VC and WebTeam should have a public but also a private section.

Daniel CHIRITA

>-----Message d'origine-----
>De : Joanna Lane [mailto:jo-uk@rcn.com] 
>Envoyé : mardi 15 juillet 2003 20:39
>À : Atlarge-Discuss@Lists. Fitug. De
>Objet : [atlarge-discuss] Verification Committee....
>
>
>http://www.fitug.de/atlarge-discuss/0307/msg00360.html
>Ron wrote:
>The VC should continue to work their own e-mail list. It is 
>private to the committee, it is asymmetric and always 
>available to everyone, regardless of bandwidth constraints.
>
>- I agree, but I fail to see how it can have open discussions 
>on a day to day basis and at the same time comply with it's 
>obligations not to disclose confidential information provided 
>to it for verification purposes by individual members. The VC 
>e-mail list must be a closed list therefore, like a security 
>committee, but certainly it's decisions can be and ought to be 
>recorded publicly, with a record of each Resolution and a 
>report of how each VC member voted, which can be widely published.
>
>Joanna
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
>For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de