[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [atlarge-discuss] Opposing the motion to permanently ban Jeff Williams
Without ascertaining the content I have to inform you that motions of
any kind can only be proposed or moved by members of this organization.
I believe you are not in that category.
Kind regards
Abel Wisman
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DannyYounger@cs.com [mailto:DannyYounger@cs.com]
> Sent: 17 July 2003 16:53
> To: atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
> Subject: [atlarge-discuss] Opposing the motion to permanently
> ban Jeff Williams
>
>
> What does a family do when one of their members is
> chronically mentally ill
> and needs to be on powerful psychotropic drugs for the rest
> of his life?
>
> Since 1998, when Jeff wrote to the U.S. Government and stated
> that all 24,000
> members of INEG "unanimously" voted to approve a model set of
> proposed bylaws
> for ICANN, we have all known that Jeff is given to delusions and
> prevarications. His outrageous claims (well-documented in a
> variety of JW FAQs), and his
> fantasy INEGroup that has now grown to 131,000 non-existent
> members, are all
> symptoms of this particular illness. This latest episode is
> nothing more than
> more-of-the-same, a non-normative mental state that has now
> taken a tangential
> form of expression -- email falsification.
>
> Jeff has been tolerated on this and other lists over the
> years precisely
> because most of us have a certain amount of compassion for
> the mentally ill.
>
> Yes, it can be particularly aggravating and frustating to
> communicate with
> folks that have such problems (especially when they take the
> form associated
> with schizophrenia -- preoccupation with systematized
> delusions related to a
> single theme, argumentativeness, and an extreme intensity in
> interpersonal
> interaction), but this is the challenge that faces a family
> when one of their own is
> afflicted.
>
> The Panel of this organization has put forth a motion that
> states in part,
> "it is decided that Jeff Williams is permanently removed from
> the memberlist,
> general list and that the organization declares him personae
> non grata to this
> organization. That upon acceptance an email is send to the
> GNSO, GA and NIST
> list with the message that Jeff Williams has been banned from this
> organization".
>
> Is this how members in an enlightened society deal with the
> mentally ill?
> Is banishment, and widespread publication of such banishment,
> the proper course
> of action, or is it an overreaction?
>
> In the past, Jeff has been sanctioned on other lists for
> different periods of
> time (mostly for exceeding established posting limits). As a
> general rule,
> he learns from the experience and modifies his behavior for a
> period of time.
> This organization would be well-served by a set of rules and
> sanctions
> governing list behavior. Jeff is not the only offending
> party on these lists. In
> recent days I have noted the intensity of personal attacks
> with epithets being
> hurled such as "cowdungboy". This type of behavior should
> similarly not be
> tolerated in civil society.
>
> My recommendation to the Panel would be as follows:
>
> 1. Banning Jeff from the list for a period of time for this
> infraction (not
> permanently)
> 2. Banning those that have engaged in personal attacks (also
> for a limited
> period of time)
> 3. Establishing rules and penalties governing list behavior
> 4. Formalizing a moderated list environment with watchdogs
> being given the
> duty of ruling on violations
>
> I ask the Panel to consider modifying their motion.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de