[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[FYI] U.S.: Can Feds Keep Up With E-Patents?
- To: debate@fitug.de
- Subject: [FYI] U.S.: Can Feds Keep Up With E-Patents?
- From: "Axel H Horns" <horns@t-online.de>
- Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 20:05:40 +0100
- Comment: This message comes from the debate mailing list.
- Organization: PA Axel H Horns
- Reply-to: horns@t-online.de
- Sender: owner-debate@fitug.de
http://www.nylj.com/stories/00/03/032300a5.htm
-------------------------------- CUT --------------------------------
March 27, 2000
Can Feds Keep Up With E-Patents?
New York Law Journal
Thursday, March 23, 2000
THE GROWING number of patent applications being filed with the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office by e-commerce companies is prompting some
technology executives to question whether the PTO has the resources
and staff to keep up.
And, this year the agency will begin to implement the American
Inventors Protection Act of 1999 (AIPA), which is expected to have a
dramatic impact on patent protection, enforcement and exploitation.
The new law also paves the way for the agency to restructure itself
to function more like a business organization.
Given the sweeping changes and challenges facing the PTO today, New
York Law Journal reporter Lisa I. Fried met recently with PTO chief
Q. Todd Dickinson, the Assistant Secretary of Commerce and
commissioner of patents and trademarks, to discuss these issues. [The
interview has been edited for clarity and brevity.]
Q: Historically, many in the patent bar assumed business methods were
not patentable. In 1998, that quickly changed, when the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled inState Street Bank v.
Signature Financial Group, 149 F3d 1368, that business methods were
patentable. Since then, the PTO has been inundated with applications
for business method patents, many from technology companies. How many
computer-related business method patents were filed and granted last
year?
A: Between October 1998 and September 1999, 2,600 applications for
computer-related business methods were filed. During that same time
period, 583 of these patents were issued.
Q: In the examination process, examiners search through prior art to
determine if the claimed invention is new, useful and non-obvious.
Some critics say your office lacks the resources to examine business
method and software patents. How much prior art exists on these
claims, and do your examiners have access to it?
[...]
-------------------------------- CUT --------------------------------