[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[FYI] FICPI on Business Methods Patents
- To: debate@fitug.de
- Subject: [FYI] FICPI on Business Methods Patents
- From: "PA Axel H Horns" <horns@t-online.de>
- Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2000 13:00:56 +0200
- Comment: This message comes from the debate mailing list.
- Organization: PA Axel H Horns
- Reply-to: horns@t-online.de
- Sender: owner-debate@fitug.de
http://www.ficpi.org/ficpi/newsletters/45/resolengl.html
----------------------------- CUT ---------------------------------
RESOLUTION F: BUSINESS METHODS
FICPI, the International Federation of Intellectual Property
Attorneys, broadly representative of the free profession of more than
70 countries, assembled at its World Congress held in Vancouver from
June 12 to June 16, 2000, passed the following Resolution :
Taking note
a.of the proposal for removal of the exclusion from patentability of
inventions relating to computer programmes as such from the list of
exclusions in Article 52(2) of the EPC in connection with the
upcoming revision of the Convention, and
b.the development of law and practice in the United States with
respect to patenting of innovations relating to electronic commerce,
Having considered
a.the significant differences between the approach taken within the
existing framework of the US Patent System and maintenance of the
exclusion of business methods from patenting in patent legislation in
Europe and the risk of distortion of global trade that may be caused
by such differences,
b.the development of patenting practice in Europe and Japan leading
to grant of patents on computer or on software operated business
methods, and
c.the US approach including the business method patent initiative
action plan published by the USPTO,
Resolves that to secure adequate IP protection to commercially highly
valuable innovations in information technology as applied in any
sector of business, including financial and E-commerce sectors, there
is an urgent need to harmonize conditions for patent protection in
this field, and
Urges relevant authorities at the global, regional and national
levels, including WIPO, WTO, the Commission of the European
Communities, the Administrative Council of the European Patent
Organization, USPTO and JPO to undertake efforts to promote such
harmonization.
----------------------------- CUT ---------------------------------