[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[FYI] ICANN's 'Government sponsored extortion' unconstitutional?
- To: debate@fitug.de
- Subject: [FYI] ICANN's 'Government sponsored extortion' unconstitutional?
- From: "Axel H Horns" <horns@ipjur.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 20:27:06 +0200
- Comment: This message comes from the debate mailing list.
- Organization: NONE
- Sender: owner-debate@fitug.de
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/13706.html
-------------------------------- CUT -------------------------------
J'accuse: ICANN's 'Government sponsored extortion' unconstitutional
By: Andrew Orlowski in San Francisco
Posted: 03/10/2000 at 14:59 GMT
Governance expert Michael Froomkin has published a draft of his
eagerly-awaited analysis of ICANN today, a document which could prove
to be a catalyst for new legal activities aimed at clipping the
activities of the Internet quango.
Froomkin warns that unless the relationship between the United States
Department of Commerce and ICANN is clarified, the ICANN model could
be adopted for the oversight of B2B commerce or distance learning in
the US.
He describes the paper entitled Wrong Turn In Cyberspace: Using ICANN
to route around the APA and the constitution as an attempt to answer
to "the central, if perhaps parochial, question: whether a U.S.
administrative agency is or should be allowed to call into being a
private corporation and then lend it sufficient control over a
government resource so that the corporation can use that control
effectively to make policy decisions that the agency cannot - or
dares not - make itself."
[...]
-------------------------------- CUT -------------------------------