[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[FYI] Cracked or not? The SDMI saga continues.
- To: debate@fitug.de
- Subject: [FYI] Cracked or not? The SDMI saga continues.
- From: "Axel H Horns" <horns@ipjur.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 10:17:05 +0200
- CC: krypto@thur.de
- Comment: This message comes from the debate mailing list.
- Organization: NONE
- Sender: owner-debate@fitug.de
http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2000/10/19/sdmi_saga/index.html
------------------------------- CUT --------------------------------
Cracked or not? The SDMI saga continues.
Did hackers successfully break watermarks designed to protect digital
music?
By Janelle Brown
Oct. 19, 2000 | On Oct. 3, Salon published a story outlining serious
divisions within the Secure Digital Music Initiative (SDMI) as to
whether the "watermarking" system that SDMI was testing as a way to
protect digitally distributed music would actually work. Then, on
Oct. 12, Salon reported that hackers who had been invited by SDMI to
test the security system had successfully broken all the watermarks.
Salon based its reporting on three sources who spoke only on the
condition that they not be identified. It also quoted an SDMI
spokesperson denying that the watermarks had been successfully
"cracked." But on Oct. 13, SDMI director Leonardo Chiariglione
declared in an Inside.com story that Salon's story was "completely
wrong, unfounded, anonymous slander."
We returned to one of our original sources, seeking a response to
Chiariglione's rebuttal. Our source replied, giving us even greater
detail about what is happening behind SDMI's closed doors. We have
decided to publish our insider's response, verbatim, along with
additional responses from both Chiariglione and Matt Oppenheim,
senior V.P. of business and legal affairs for the Recording Industry
Association of America (RIAA).
[...]
------------------------------- CUT --------------------------------