[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[FYI] (Fwd) FC: News web sites try to charge for links to articles
- To: debate@fitug.de
- Subject: [FYI] (Fwd) FC: News web sites try to charge for links to articles
- From: "Axel H Horns" <horns@ipjur.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 21:50:08 +0100
- Comment: This message comes from the debate mailing list.
- Organization: NONE
- Sender: owner-debate@fitug.de
------- Forwarded message follows -------
Date sent: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 08:38:42 -0500
To: politech@politechbot.com
From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Subject: FC: News web sites try to charge for links to articles
Send reply to: declan@well.com
http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,40850,00.html
Free Links, Only $50 Apiece
by Declan McCullagh (declan@wired.com)
2:00 a.m. Dec. 28, 2000 PST
WASHINGTON -- Online news sites are turning to a novel way to make
some extra cash: requiring fees for links.
The Albuquerque Journal charges $50 for the right to link to each
of its articles. Localbusiness.com and Latino.com are more
generous, and permit one to five links without payment.
There's just one catch. Legal experts say no U.S. law or court
decision allows a website to successfully demand payment for links
to its content. Such linking is a common practice online and
allows services like search engines to exist.
"They have no right to use the legal system to stop the linking,"
says Eugene Volokh, a professor of law at UCLA. "But if sites
really want to stop linking, they can easily do it by
technological means, by periodically shifting the file names of
their pages, by delivering the pages using CGI scripts rather than
direct links, or by including HTML code that checks the address of
the site from which the user arrived."
The sites that limit unapproved linking rely on a service provided
by Renton, Washington, startup iCopyright.com. In exchange for a
portion of the licensing revenues, customarily less than 50
percent, icopyright.com handles collecting payment for article
reprints, photocopy licenses or links.
Nobody questions a publisher's legal right to demand payments for
article reprints, at least for substantial quantities. But
iCopyright's license agreement, which is featured at the bottom of
articles at its partners' sites, says the company can selectively
grant or withhold "HTML Link permission (that) allows you to link
to a specified Web page."
The iCopyright.com license agreement also restricts what can be
said about the content of the linked-to article. If you sign up to
pay $50 to link to, say, an Albuquerque Journal article, you agree
not to say anything "derogatory" about "the author, the
publication from which the content came, or any person connected
with the creation of the content or depicted in the content."
Because the agreement limits negative comments about someone
"depicted" in a news story, someone linking to an article about
President-elect George W. Bush and Vice President Al Gore would
not be permitted to criticize either one.
Paula Tobol, iCopyright.com's senior marketing manager, defended
the company's license agreements. "The license is to guarantee the
link and give you peace of mind that it will stay available for a
specified period of time," Tobol said in e-mail to Wired News.
"Currently, the legal issue of linking is somewhat unclear."
[...]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--- POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing
list You may redistribute this message freely if it remains intact. To
subscribe, visit http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html This
message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
---
------- End of forwarded message -------