[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[FYI] EU Community Patent
- To: debate@lists.fitug.de
- Subject: [FYI] EU Community Patent
- From: "Axel H Horns" <horns@ipjur.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 12:24:17 +0200
<http://europa.eu.int/rapid/start/cgi/guesten.ksh?p_action.gettxt=gt&
doc=MEMO/01/210|0|RAPID&lg=EN>
-------------------------------- CUT -------------------------------
Results of the Internal Market Council - Brussels, 31 May 2001
DN: MEMO/01/210 Date: 2001-06-01
TXT: EN
PDF: EN
Word Processed: EN
MEMO/01/210
Brussels, 1st June 2001
Results of the Internal Market Council - Brussels, 31 May 2001
Community Patent (JT)
Internal Market Commissioner Frits Bolkestein stressed to Member
States the need to respect the four key principles of the proposal to
establish a Community Patent, namely affordability, legal security,
procedural efficiency and simplicity. He also underlined that in the
year since the proposal was presented by the Commission (see
IP/00/714), little progress has been made towards meeting the goal
set by the March 2000 Lisbon European Council of adopting the
Community Patent proposal before the end of 2001 as part of the EU's
efforts to become the most competitive economy in the world by 2010.
As a result of very considerable efforts by the Swedish President of
the Council, Leif Pagrotsky, supported by the Commission, a
compromise was reached on guidelines for future work on the proposal
based on the principles of full respect of the Community legal order,
legal security, affordability, user responsiveness, procedural
efficiency, simplicity and non-discrimination between Community
citizens. These guidelines recognise the central role to be played by
the Munich-based European Patent Office (EPO) in the granting and
administration of Community Patents, whilst recognising that national
patent offices should also have an important role. This role for
national patent offices would include advising potential applicants
for Community Patents, receiving applications and forwarding them to
the EPO and disseminating information about Community Patents.
National patent offices would also be able to carry out activities in
their respective working languages, such as searches related to
Community Patent applications, as long as they met agreed
requirements. The questions of the nature of the activities and of a
possible quantitative limit on the activities will still have to be
further considered. Applicants would remain free to have their
Community Patent applications fully processed by the EPO.
The guidelines also recognise the need to keep costs at a competitive
level and that a certain percentage of income from annual renewal
fees for the Community Patent should be distributed among Member
States/national patent offices. On jurisdictional arrangements, the
guidelines indicate setting up of a system in accordance with the
framework of Articles 225 a and 229 a of the EC Treaty as adopted at
Nice. The first instance judicial panel should be arranged with
account taken of the need for uniform application of Community law
and factors such as cost effectiveness, demand and local languages,
closeness to users and use of any existing infrastructure and
expertise. Appeals would be heard by the EC's Court of First
Instance. On languages, the guidelines state that the Community
Patent system should be based on the general principles outlined
above, including the principle of non-discrimination.
The Council also agreed to mandate the Presidency to take the
necessary procedural steps to request the Administrative Council of
the European Patent Organisation to put on the agenda of its next
meeting (25 to 29 June 2001) the convening of a Diplomatic Conference
for the revision of the 1973 European Patent Convention (EPC), in
order to accommodate the Community Patent, on the understanding that
no negotiations on this matter would begin before a negotiation
mandate was decided by the Council. This was the procedural step the
Council had proved unable to agree at its previous meeting on 12th
March (see MEMO/01/80).
The proposal for a Council Regulation to create a Community Patent
would give inventors the option of obtaining a single patent legally
valid throughout the European Union The proposal would significantly
lessen the burden on business and encourage innovation by making it
cheaper to obtain a patent and by providing a clear legal framework
in case of dispute. The Lisbon and Feira European Councils cited the
creation of a Community Patent as an essential part of Europe's
efforts to harness the results of research to new scientific and
technological developments and so contribute to ensuring a
competitive, knowledge-based economy in Europe.
Under the Commission's proposal, Community Patents would be issued by
the existing European Patent Office in Munich. National and European
Patents would coexist with the Community Patent system, so that
inventors would be free to choose which type of patent protection
best suited their needs. This proposal would provide for a Community
Patent system that was both affordable and legally certain.
[...]
-------------------------------- CUT -------------------------------