[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [FYI] JPEGs are not free: Patent holder pursues IP grab

Axel H Horns <horns@ipjur.com>:

> http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/26272.html

> A video conferencing company based in Austin, Texas says it's going 
> to pursue royalties on the transmission of JPEG images.  

> US 4,698,672 A                            Filed: October 27, 1986   

Die zitierten Patentansprüche beschreiben verlustfreie Kompression
("reduce the amount of data utilized to represent the input signals"
etc.). Ist überhaupt irgendetwas darin spezifisch für JPEG?

To unsubscribe, e-mail: debate-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: debate-help@lists.fitug.de