[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [FYI] JPEGs are not free: Patent holder pursues IP grab
- To: debate@lists.fitug.de
- Subject: Re: [FYI] JPEGs are not free: Patent holder pursues IP grab
- From: moeller@cdc.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de (Bodo Moeller)
- Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 18:52:14 +0200 (CEST)
- Delivered-To: mailing list debate@lists.fitug.de
- In-Reply-To: <3D372402.1092.22418F@localhost>
- List-Help: <mailto:debate-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Id: <debate.lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:debate@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:debate-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:debate-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact debate-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
- References: <3D372402.1092.22418F@localhost>
Axel H Horns <horns@ipjur.com>:
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/26272.html
> A video conferencing company based in Austin, Texas says it's going
> to pursue royalties on the transmission of JPEG images.
> US 4,698,672 A Filed: October 27, 1986
Die zitierten Patentansprüche beschreiben verlustfreie Kompression
("reduce the amount of data utilized to represent the input signals"
etc.). Ist überhaupt irgendetwas darin spezifisch für JPEG?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: debate-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: debate-help@lists.fitug.de