Re: [FYI] (Fwd) FC: U.K. Internet providers must begin to archivee-mail

[Heiko Recktenwald <uzs106@ibm.rhrz.uni-bonn.de>]

> flaws. First, the Home Office has not yet told ISPs how they will be
> compensated for performing their interception and storage duties. More

Wie ist das denn bei uns? Faengt ja schon bei Buessow an, Inanspruchnahme
von Nichtstoerern. IMHO niente. Und sonst?

> significantly, though the Act was passed to fight terrorism and
> organized crime, it applies only to large ISPs. Anyone who wants to

Das ist ok. Chapeau. Besser 4/5 richtig ueberwacht als keinen.

> avoid interception merely needs to locate an ISP with less than 10,000
> customers.  For those ISPs subject to the law, they have one working

Na und? Es geht eben um ganz andere Dinge.

> day to provide a mechanism to intercept communications once an
> interception has been authorized. The ISP must transmit the

Fuer Compuserv doch sicher kein Problem.

> intercepted data in real time to the individual who applied for the

Wer kann denn "individual" sein ?

> warrant and must be able to simultaneously intercept the
> communications of up to 1 in every 10,000 people who use its service.

Das ist doch, wenn ich mich recht erinnere, viel weniger als in
unserer Teledingsbumsueberwachungsverordnung.

> The text of the Act may be found at
>    http://www.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/20000023.htm

Ich bin bestuerzt ;-)

Was Compuserve etc muessen ist mir egal. So richtig "privat" ist das
Internet noch nie gewesen.


H.


-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: debate-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: debate-help@lists.fitug.de