[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[FYI] Spam Blocker Has Opposite Effect
- To: debate@lists.fitug.de
- Subject: [FYI] Spam Blocker Has Opposite Effect
- From: "Axel H Horns" <horns@ipjur.com>
- Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 10:17:05 +0200
- Delivered-To: mailing list debate@lists.fitug.de
- List-Help: <mailto:debate-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Id: <debate.lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:debate@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:debate-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:debate-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact debate-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
- Organization: NONE
- Priority: normal
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,55613,00.html
------------------------------- CUT -------------------------------
Spam Blocker Has Opposite Effect
By Michelle Delio
02:00 AM Oct. 08, 2002 PDT
Users of SpamNet, a popular peer-to-peer unsolicited e-mail filtering
service, had grown accustomed to virtually junk-free inboxes.
So when spam suddenly started pouring in last week, SpamNet users
weren't very happy.
[...]
------------------------------- CUT -------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: debate-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: debate-help@lists.fitug.de