[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[FYI] Property Interests in Conflict -- the Technology/Copyright Crossroads


-------------------------------- CUT --------------------------------

Property Interests in Conflict -- the Technology/Copyright Crossroads 

Remarks for the Progress and Freedom Foundation conference on “The 
Future of Online Music, Movies & Games”  

By Mike Godwin
Senior Technology Counsel
Public Knowledge

Based on remarks originally delivered June 10, 2003

In his comments on the first panel at this conference, our master of 
ceremonies Jim DeLong expressed his distress at anti-property 
rhetoric. And it’s true that current debates about copyright in the 
Internet Age have led to some commentators to argue for the 
distinction between copyright interests and the traditional interests 
associated with real and tangible property. Those commentators have a 
point, insofar as the bundle of rights associated with “intellectual 
property” (which is itself only a few decades old as a term of art) 
is different in many ways from the rights associated with real or 
tangible property (as well as from the rights associated with “non-
intellectual but intangible property,” such as accounts receivable).  

But it is a point that doesn’t advance the current debate at the 
intersection of copyright and technology policy, because it doesn’t 
point to a resolution of that debate that will generate much of a 
consensus among policymakers or among the rest of us.  

Furthermore, we should also consider that one source of anti-property 
rhetoric is the rhetoric of those who want to stress the connection 
between (or even identity of) intellectual property and traditional 
property interests. That’s because there is a regrettable tendency to 
invoke property doctrine as if, standing alone, it were dispositive 
of any the questions raised by computers, file-trading, the Internet, 
and the current struggle at the intersection of copyright and 
technology policy. There’s a tendency to invoke property doctrine 
loudly and then sit down, satisfied that all questions have been 

Jeff Eisenach suggested in his remarks from the audience that the pro-
property/anti-property rhetorical divide maps to the traditional left-
right polical spectrum, but that characterization is clearly 
incorrect; Richard Epstein noted, for example, that even within the 
American libertarian movement, itself generally sympathetic to pro-
property arguments, there is division these issues, and when it comes 
to libertarian views on copyright and technology policy, I can assure 
you that there’s even more division.  

Assume copyrighted works are property -- then what?  


-------------------------------- CUT --------------------------------

To unsubscribe, e-mail: debate-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: debate-help@lists.fitug.de