[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fwd: PGP55]
- To: debate@fitug.de
- Subject: Re: [Fwd: PGP55]
- From: lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)
- Date: 17 Oct 1997 13:49:39 GMT
- Comment: This message comes from the debate mailing list.
- Newsgroups: iks.lists.fitug
- Organization: IKS GmbH Jena
- References: <344760F7.5123@informatik.uni-bonn.de>
- Sender: owner-debate@fitug.de
* Markus Fleck wrote:
>heated language. But the PGP 5.5 corporate message recovery features are
>*not* key escrow or key recovery or trusted third party, and don't have
>anything to do with these concepts. They are a forced Cc to a corporate
"forced Cc to a corporate key" is communication key recovery. Communication
key recovery is GAK.
If someone is needed to point out the security holes of using PGP 5.x more
in detail on FiFF congress... I can do this.
--
"Erzwungene Kopie an einen Firmenschlüssel" ist
Kommunikationsschlüsselzugriff. Kommunikationsschlüsselzugriff ist
Regierungszugriff auf Schlüssel.
Wenn jemand gebraucht wird, auf dem FiFF Kongreß über Sicherheitslöcher in
PGP 5.x ausführlicher zu berichten... kann ich das machen.
PS: Der Plural is Absicht!
- References:
- [Fwd: PGP55]
- From: Markus Fleck <fleck@informatik.uni-bonn.de>