[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[FYI] "Neither were able to identify a specific case sentenced i
- To: debate@fitug.de
- Subject: [FYI] "Neither were able to identify a specific case sentenced i
- From: Horns@t-online.de (Axel H. Horns)
- Date: Thu, 3 Jun 1999 15:28:58 +0100
- Comment: This message comes from the debate mailing list.
- Comments: Sender has elected to use 8-bit data in this message. If problems arise, refer to postmaster at sender's site.
- Organization: Private Site
- Reply-to: horns@t-online.de
- Sender: owner-debate@fitug.de
http://jya.com/ussc032699.htm
-------------------------------- CUT --------------------------------
2 June 1999
Source: Three-page fax from Office of General Counsel, US Sentencing
Commission. Thanks to MC.
UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION
ONE COLUMBUS CIRCLE, NE
SUITE 2-500, SOUTH LOBBY
WASHINGTON, DC 20002-8002
(202) 502-4500
FAX (202) 502-4699
March 26, 1999
The Honorable J. Dennis Hastert
Speaker of the House of Representatives
H-326 United States Capitol
Washington, D.C. 20515
Re: Encryption Offenses
Dear Mr. Speaker,
[...]
No cases sentenced during fiscal year 1997 using encryption technology
and receiving sentencing enhancement under U.S.S.C. §3C1.1 have been
identified in the U.S.S.C. monitoring datafile. In an effort to
validate this finding, staff in the Commission's Office of General
Counsel searched the Lexis-Nexis and Westlaw federal case law datasets
for judicial opinions in which the word "encryption" was used in the
published decision. This search resulted in a small number of cases,
none of which were sentenced during fiscal year 1997. Secondly, the
two agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation who authored the
attached document "Encryption: The Impact on Law Enforcement" [PDF
141K] were contacted. Neither were able to identify a specific case
sentenced in 1997 involving encryption.
[...]
-------------------------------- CUT --------------------------------
See also:
http://jya.com/en32699.pdf