[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Mediation/ADR im Urheberrecht
- To: "'debate@fitug.de'" <debate@fitug.de>
- Subject: Mediation/ADR im Urheberrecht
- From: Johannes Ulbricht <Johannes_Ulbricht@csi.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 05:49:29 +0200
- Comment: This message comes from the debate mailing list.
- Sender: owner-debate@fitug.de
LAW JOURNAL ARTICLE ABSTRACTS AND SUMMARIES
------------------------------------------------------------
1. Alternative Dispute Resolution in Commercial
Intellectual Property Disputes
Scott H. Blackman Fulbright & Jaworski, L.L.P.
Rebecca M. McNeill Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow,Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P.
American Univ. Law Review
American University
August 1998, vol. 6, iss. 47
http://www.wcl.american.edu/pub/journals/lawrev/blackman.htm
REF: ULRP9900111
ABSTRACT:
The intent of this Article is to discuss various
alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods and show
how they may become valuable to intellectual property
practitioners in their practices. Part I describes
various ADR techniques including arbitration, private
judging, mediation, advisory opinions, and non-binding
mock-trials. Part II focuses on major types of
intellectual property disputes and why ADR offers
distinct advantages in each context: copyright and
software, patent, trademark and trade dress, trade
secret and unfair competition, and licensing disputes.
Part III discusses the deference courts increasingly
give to ADR decisions, thereby providing parties more
effective and efficient remedies.