[ICANN-EU] the future of icann-europe: opposition?

[Marc Lehmann <pcg@goof.com>]

On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 09:13:28AM +0200, Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org> wrote:
> > Strange that ICANN's nominating committee thought we would have
> > more difficulty to find our own candidates than Africa, where
> > they nominated just two, to mention only the two extremes.
> 
> This is indeed interesting.  In particular, I'm asking myself why it

Let's honestly say what most people think: the ICANN not even tries
to hide the fact that they want *THEIR* loyal followers (THEIR = the
industries!) on board (= in the board).

So I think trying to get them would be a very worthy goal. I don't know
wether I have time for it, but I'll try to start a letter to ICANN today,
and I would be happy to recieve help from other canidates in that. (Yes,
see http://www.icann.org/general/reconsideration.htm).

I am also very impressed in what Jefsay morfin said about staying together
here. Most of us will not be able to change anything (even if they become
board members), for the obvious reasons, so let's practise opposition.

Reassuring comment highly welcome ;)

-- 
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg@opengroup.org |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |