[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ICANN-EU] more questions: Future of the DNS?
- To: Lutz Donnerhacke <lutz@iks-jena.de>
- Subject: Re: [ICANN-EU] more questions: Future of the DNS?
- From: Marc Schneiders <marc@venster.nl>
- Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 16:51:58 +0200 (MEST)
- cc: icann-europe@fitug.de
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- In-Reply-To: <slrn8pif43.hv.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de>
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
On 15 Aug 2000, Lutz Donnerhacke wrote:
> * Marc Schneiders wrote:
> >On 14 Aug 2000, Lutz Donnerhacke wrote:
> >> * Marc Schneiders wrote:
> >> >In theory, Marc, and perhaps for other issues. It seems we, Marc and Marc.
> >> >agree about the sheer stupidity (no apology!) of the number idea.
> >>
> >> How to solve the few2one mapping of names to phone numbers?
> >> (0900-CALL-ME-NOW)
> >
> >Sub-numbers like sub-domains?
>
> Sorry for being too condensed. My question was: What happens with the
> few2one mappings used on phone numbers? Are trademark owners allowed to
> restructure the whole dialing system?
I am no expert on those. I would suggest Ms Oppenheimer will answer this
for you. In the USA there seems to be no (official!) trademark preference
with tollfree numbers.
> >I like DNS better:
> >
> >.org
> >.schneiders.org
>
> You are a multinational non commerical Organisation? Cool.
No, schneiders.org is. marc@schneiders.org is one user.
> >Much more intelligent than numbers. Much more human. Much more space as
> >well.
>
> 'Donnerhacke' is a keyword, 'Schneiders' is a catchword. That's the
> difference.
I find Donnerhacke to be much more catchy than Schneiders. *g*
--
Marc Schneiders ------- Venster - http://www.venster.nl
marc@venster.nl - marc@bijt.net - marc@schneiders.org