[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [ICANN-EU] About Nom-Com issue and 'reconsideration' petition
- To: Andreas.Fuegner@lizenz.com, R.Gaetano@iaea.org
- Subject: RE: [ICANN-EU] About Nom-Com issue and 'reconsideration' petition
- From: "Griffini Giorgio" <grigio@mediapoint.it>
- Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 15:11:56 +0200
- CC: icann-europe@fitug.de
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- In-reply-to: <14858C5D7DA4D111B0A90001FA371FD10383D7FC@sg-m1.iaea.or.at>
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
R.Gaetano wrote:
> Giorgio,
>
> There are 71 candidates, 2% each means... 140% ;>)
>
Hi,
I never thought this trick as a serious way to circumvent the ballott seat
shortage and yes, I'm able to do sums :-) (142% to be precise :-)
> Please bear in mind that we do not know what will be the exact number of
> validated members on the 31 August.
> Also, most of the people joined to vote for the "real" ballot, and probably
> (given also the short time and the vacation period) are not even paying a
> lot of attention to this phase.
>
> Maybe our first objective should be to get the media's attention to this
> phase, and to provide reasons for the importance of having participation so
> that at least some few pass the 2% cap.
> Whoever of us gets into the ballot will have more "weight" the more voters
> the process has had.
>
> To Andreas I would say that to disperse forces in trying to get an
> (improbable) reconsideration on the matter is lowering the chances of
> getting achieved the objective I outlined before.
> I am not happy, as I said in a previous message, with the sudden change of
> the Yokohama orientation on the ratio "membership" vs. "NomCom" nominatated
> candidates. But this is a matter that can be discussed later (because a
> decision has been, alas, taken), and the only way to revert the situation is
> to have the Membership endorse the membership-nominated candidates (and
> eventually have one of these elected in October).
>
I agree with your considerations and overall resulting figures will play a big
role in the discussion. (especially role of Europe and North America respect
to Asia/Pacific).
About giving media coverage I dislike, being a candidate, to personally push
some to give more attention than media itslef likes to give because, although
done with smooth and fair intentions, it will sound to me as a little biased
action. Of course, I'm ready to change idea if the deadline is approaching
and no-one of candidates is enough close to the estimated 2% final thresold.
Best regards
Giorgio Griffini