[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ICANN-EU] Re: [icann-candidates] ICANNER Squatters
- To: Rédaction <telepresse@hotpop.com>
- Subject: [ICANN-EU] Re: [icann-candidates] ICANNER Squatters
- From: Karl Auerbach <karl@CaveBear.com>
- Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 12:54:31 -0800 (PST)
- cc: icann-candidates@egroups.com, icann-europe@fitug.de
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- In-Reply-To: <5.0.0.25.0.20001029162723.02712dc0@pop.free.fr>
- Reply-To: Karl Auerbach <karl@CaveBear.com>
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
> I would be interested in knowing your evalutation of the ICANN annoucement
> of 4 interim Members of the initial BoD to stay 4 years instead of a few
> months and to represent you.
Personally I feel that it is a breach of faith.
Not that this is anything surprising or new - ICANN has from the outset
repeatedly broken its bond of trust with the Internet community. Just
look at how ICANN has from its very first meeting flagrantly tossed aside
its obligations to "operate to the maximum extent feasible in an open and
transparent manner". Just look at how ICANN deferred even the creation of
an at large membership. And why did ICANN fill only a portion of the
at-large seats?
By permitting this boardsquatting ICANN has once again slapped the
Internet community in the face.
--karl--